Xenharmonic Wiki:Cross-platform dialogue: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Agreed with Flora's approach
Line 188: Line 188:


::::: I think most users will want a pure-octave tuning to start with and that's why the controversy is on the pure-octave tunings. If there was only one tuning then KE would meet the needs of all parties the best, but at this point it's clear that POTE is to be preserved and CTE is to be added. If we add KE to POTE then they serve the same purpose so it's a waste of space. So I'll add CTE to POTE while leaving the question of replacing POTE with KE to the future. I think additional tunings can be added in the dedicated page for the temperament, properly organized as its own block. (All those additions are low-priority to me so if I'm doing it all alone, it won't happen too quick.) [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
::::: I think most users will want a pure-octave tuning to start with and that's why the controversy is on the pure-octave tunings. If there was only one tuning then KE would meet the needs of all parties the best, but at this point it's clear that POTE is to be preserved and CTE is to be added. If we add KE to POTE then they serve the same purpose so it's a waste of space. So I'll add CTE to POTE while leaving the question of replacing POTE with KE to the future. I think additional tunings can be added in the dedicated page for the temperament, properly organized as its own block. (All those additions are low-priority to me so if I'm doing it all alone, it won't happen too quick.) [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::: Alright, sounds like a good plan to me. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|Budjarn Lambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 09:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)