Quintaleap family: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.276 | POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.276 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 109, 121, 133 }} | ||
Badness: 0.014623 | Badness: 0.014623 | ||
== Quintupole == | == Quintupole == | ||
{{Main| Quintupole }} | |||
The ''quintupole'' temperament tempers out the octagar comma (4000/3969) and the mistisma (458752/455625) in the 7-limit; 896/891 (pentacircle), 1375/1372 (moctdel), and 4375/4356 (fantares, luluzoquadyo) in the 11-limit. The word "quintupole" means ''five poles'', but also a play on the words "quintuple" and "polypyth". It is so named because the generator is 1/5 of the [[Porwell temperaments #Polypyth|polypyth]] fourth (~4/3, about 495.8 cents). [[User:Xenllium|Xenllium]] proposes the pronunciation of the word "quintupole" as /'kwɪntʊpəʊl/ or /'kwɪntʊpoʊl/, like as "quin-to-pole". ''Not to be confused with [[#Quintapole|quint<u>'''a'''</u>pole]] temperament (12&85).'' | The ''quintupole'' temperament tempers out the octagar comma (4000/3969) and the mistisma (458752/455625) in the 7-limit; 896/891 (pentacircle), 1375/1372 (moctdel), and 4375/4356 (fantares, luluzoquadyo) in the 11-limit. The word "quintupole" means ''five poles'', but also a play on the words "quintuple" and "polypyth". It is so named because the generator is 1/5 of the [[Porwell temperaments #Polypyth|polypyth]] fourth (~4/3, about 495.8 cents). [[User:Xenllium|Xenllium]] proposes the pronunciation of the word "quintupole" as /'kwɪntʊpəʊl/ or /'kwɪntʊpoʊl/, like as "quin-to-pole". ''Not to be confused with [[#Quintapole|quint<u>'''a'''</u>pole]] temperament (12&85).'' | ||
Line 61: | Line 63: | ||
POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.156 | POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.156 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 109, 121, 351bde, 472bdee }} | ||
Badness: 0.056501 | Badness: 0.056501 | ||
Line 74: | Line 76: | ||
POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.165 | POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.165 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 109, 121 }} | ||
Badness: 0.038431 | Badness: 0.038431 | ||
Line 87: | Line 89: | ||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.172 | POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.172 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 109, 121 }} | ||
Badness: 0.028721 | Badness: 0.028721 | ||
Line 100: | Line 102: | ||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.164 | POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.164 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 109, 121 }} | ||
Badness: 0.023818 | Badness: 0.023818 | ||
== Quintapole == | == Quintapole == | ||
The ''quintapole'' temperament (12&85) tempers out the marvel comma (225/224) and 7812500/7411887 (sepru-atritriyo). In the 11-limit, it tempers out the ptolemisma (100/99) as well as 85184/84035 (trilo-aquinru-agu). It is so named for the following reasons - it has the same commas as the [[Marvel family # | The ''quintapole'' temperament (12&85) tempers out the marvel comma (225/224) and 7812500/7411887 (sepru-atritriyo). In the 11-limit, it tempers out the ptolemisma (100/99) as well as 85184/84035 (trilo-aquinru-agu). It is so named for the following reasons - it has the same commas as the [[Marvel family #Apollo|apollo temperament]], and its generator is a semitone five of which gives a flat fourth (~4/3, about 495 cents). [[User:Xenllium|Xenllium]] proposes the pronunciation of the word "quintapole" as /'kwɪntəpəʊl/ or /'kwɪntəpoʊl/, like as "quint-a-pole". ''Not to be confused with [[#Quintupole|quint<u>'''u'''</u>pole]] temperament (12&121).'' | ||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7 | Subgroup: 2.3.5.7 | ||
Line 130: | Line 132: | ||
POTE generator: ~21/20 = 98.954 | POTE generator: ~21/20 = 98.954 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 73ce, 85, 97d }} | ||
Badness: 0.104353 | Badness: 0.104353 | ||
==== Galileic ==== | |||
The name ''galileic'' comes from "[[wikipedia:Vincenzo Galilei|Vincenzo Galilei]]", because this temperament is strongly related to [[18/17 equal-step tuning|Galilei tuning]]. | |||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13 | |||
Comma list: 100/99, 225/224, 275/273, 12168/12005 | |||
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 1 0 -1 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 22 42 57 }}] | |||
POTE generator: ~21/20 = 98.992 | |||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 73ceff, 85f, 97d }} | |||
Badness: 0.078183 | |||
===== 17-limit ===== | |||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17 | |||
Comma list: 100/99, 120/119, 225/224, 275/273, 2431/2401 | |||
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 1 0 -1 5 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 22 42 57 -11 }}] | |||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.002 | |||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 73ceffg, 85fg, 97dg }} | |||
Badness: 0.058826 | |||
===== 19-limit ===== | |||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | |||
Comma list: 100/99, 120/119, 225/224, 247/245, 275/273, 361/357 | |||
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 1 0 -1 5 4 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 22 42 57 -11 3 }}] | |||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 98.987 | |||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 73ceffg, 85fg, 97dg }} | |||
Badness: 0.045459 | |||
==== Catagali ==== | |||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13 | |||
Comma list: 100/99, 225/224, 847/845, 1040/1029 | |||
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 1 0 0 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 22 42 45 }}] | |||
POTE generator: ~21/20 = 98.882 | |||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 73ce, 85 }} | |||
Badness: 0.074180 | |||
===== 17-limit ===== | |||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17 | |||
Comma list: 100/99, 120/119, 225/224, 442/441, 847/845 | |||
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 22 42 45 -11 }}] | |||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 98.905 | |||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 73ceg, 85g }} | |||
Badness: 0.057924 | |||
===== 19-limit ===== | |||
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17.19 | |||
Comma list: 100/99, 120/119, 209/208, 225/224, 361/357, 442/441 | |||
Mapping: [{{val| 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 4 }}, {{val| 0 -5 16 22 42 45 -11 3 }}] | |||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 98.888 | |||
Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 73ceg, 85g }} | |||
Badness: 0.044714 | |||
== Quinticosiennic == | == Quinticosiennic == | ||
Line 160: | Line 242: | ||
POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.318 | POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.318 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12, 133, 145 }} | ||
Badness: 0.080674 | Badness: 0.080674 | ||
Line 173: | Line 255: | ||
POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.307 | POTE generator: ~35/33 = 99.307 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 133, 145 }} | ||
Badness: 0.052464 | Badness: 0.052464 | ||
Line 186: | Line 268: | ||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.308 | POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.308 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 133, 145 }} | ||
Badness: 0.037108 | Badness: 0.037108 | ||
Line 199: | Line 281: | ||
POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.303 | POTE generator: ~18/17 = 99.303 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 12f, 133, 145 }} | ||
Badness: 0.028440 | Badness: 0.028440 | ||
Line 229: | Line 311: | ||
POTE generator: ~36/35 = 49.622 | POTE generator: ~36/35 = 49.622 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 97d, 121, 145, 266e }} | ||
Badness: 0.084612 | Badness: 0.084612 | ||
Line 242: | Line 324: | ||
POTE generator: ~36/35 = 49.620 | POTE generator: ~36/35 = 49.620 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 97d, 121, 266ef }} | ||
Badness: 0.041763 | Badness: 0.041763 | ||
Line 255: | Line 337: | ||
POTE generator: ~34/33 = 49.621 | POTE generator: ~34/33 = 49.621 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 97dg, 121, 266efg }} | ||
Badness: 0.025552 | Badness: 0.025552 | ||
Line 268: | Line 350: | ||
POTE generator: ~34/33 = 49.624 | POTE generator: ~34/33 = 49.624 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence | Optimal ET sequence: {{Optimal ET sequence| 24, 97dg, 121, 145, 266efg }} | ||
Badness: 0.021208 | Badness: 0.021208 |