Dimcomp family: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 8: Line 8:
[[Mapping]]: [{{val| 4 0 0 -1 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 -1 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 2 }}]
[[Mapping]]: [{{val| 4 0 0 -1 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 -1 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 2 }}]


{{Val list|legend=1| 8d, 12, 44d, 48d, 56, 60, 68, 72, 140, 152, 212, 224, 364, 588, 952 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 12, 44d, 48d, 56, 60, 68, 72, 140, 152, 212, 224, 364, 588, 952 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.783 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.783 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 19: Line 19:
[[Mapping]]: [{{val| 4 0 0 -1 5 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 -1 -3 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 2 3 }}]
[[Mapping]]: [{{val| 4 0 0 -1 5 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 -1 -3 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 2 3 }}]


{{Val list|legend=1| 68, 72, 140, 152, 224, 364, 436, 588 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 68, 72, 140, 152, 224, 364, 436, 588 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.624 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
[[Badness]]: 0.624 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 30: Line 30:
Mapping: [{{val| 4 0 0 -1 5 -16 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 -1 -3 -1 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 2 3 4 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 4 0 0 -1 5 -16 }}, {{val| 0 1 0 -1 -3 -1 }}, {{val| 0 0 1 2 3 4 }}]


Vals: {{Val list| 68, 72, 140, 152f, 212, 224, 364, 436, 588, 660, 1024c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 68, 72, 140, 152f, 212, 224, 364, 436, 588, 660, 1024c }}


Badness: 0.820 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 0.820 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Line 41: Line 41:
Mapping: [{{val| 8 1 3 3 16 0 }}, {{val| 0 3 4 5 3 0 }}, {{val| 0 0 0 0 0 1 }}]
Mapping: [{{val| 8 1 3 3 16 0 }}, {{val| 0 3 4 5 3 0 }}, {{val| 0 0 0 0 0 1 }}]


Vals: {{Val list| 72, 144, 152f, 224, 824d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 72, 144, 152f, 224, 824d }}


Badness: 1.244 × 10<sup>-3</sup>
Badness: 1.244 × 10<sup>-3</sup>

Revision as of 18:08, 7 May 2023

The dimcomp family of rank-3 temperaments tempers out the dimcomp comma, 390625/388962.

Dimcomp

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 390625/388962

Mapping: [4 0 0 -1], 0 1 0 -1], 0 0 1 2]]

Optimal ET sequence8d, 12, 44d, 48d, 56, 60, 68, 72, 140, 152, 212, 224, 364, 588, 952

Badness: 0.783 × 10-3

Undecimal dimcomp

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 1375/1372, 6250/6237

Mapping: [4 0 0 -1 5], 0 1 0 -1 -3], 0 0 1 2 3]]

Optimal ET sequence68, 72, 140, 152, 224, 364, 436, 588

Badness: 0.624 × 10-3

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 625/624, 1375/1372, 2080/2079

Mapping: [4 0 0 -1 5 -16], 0 1 0 -1 -3 -1], 0 0 1 2 3 4]]

Optimal ET sequence68, 72, 140, 152f, 212, 224, 364, 436, 588, 660, 1024c

Badness: 0.820 × 10-3

Octopod

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 540/539, 1375/1372, 4000/3993

Mapping: [8 1 3 3 16 0], 0 3 4 5 3 0], 0 0 0 0 0 1]]

Optimal ET sequence72, 144, 152f, 224, 824d

Badness: 1.244 × 10-3