SAKryukov
Joined 23 November 2020
No edit summary |
Commas, terms |
||
| Line 315: | Line 315: | ||
Hey, SA, I think I ended up naming a few commas that I can't find names for on the [http://www.huygens-fokker.org/docs/intervals.html Huygens-Fokker Foundation's list of intervals]- these would be the [[quartisma]], the [[nexuma|nexus comma]] and the [[symbiosma|symbiotic comma]], the [[Alpharabian comma]] and the [[Betarabian comma]]... What do you think of these names? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | Hey, SA, I think I ended up naming a few commas that I can't find names for on the [http://www.huygens-fokker.org/docs/intervals.html Huygens-Fokker Foundation's list of intervals]- these would be the [[quartisma]], the [[nexuma|nexus comma]] and the [[symbiosma|symbiotic comma]], the [[Alpharabian comma]] and the [[Betarabian comma]]... What do you think of these names? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
: Sorry, nothing certain. Even though I'm familiar with many well-known comma names, I did not think enough of the the motivation and the correspondence between the nature of each comma and its naming. Besides, to make your considerations comprehensible, you probably need to explain everything in some definitive order: first, the schema of getting to one or another comma, which intervals or chains come to the comma, in what way, then, you need to present some rationale behind the suggested name, relating the nature (its role, significance, historical facts) and the proposed naming. More generally, I can see some specifically musical communication problems. It is not as trivial as the specific terminology not quite understandable by people from the outside word, no, this is some deficit of communication culture, resembling, say, irregularities of classical chemical nomenclature... — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Tuesday 2020 December 1, 00:24 UTC'' | |||