Xenharmonic Wiki:Elections: Difference between revisions

TallKite (talk | contribs)
Fredg999: voting period
Update
 
Line 7: Line 7:
You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.
You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.


==Fredg999 for bureaucrat (Oct 2025)==
== Fredg999 for bureaucrat (Oct 2025) ==


Voting is open for 1 week after the 3rd vote has been cast. Voting is now closed.
Voting is open for 1 week after the 3rd vote has been cast. Voting is now closed.
Line 13: Line 13:
Please place any future elections above this one, so that the most recent ones are always on top.
Please place any future elections above this one, so that the most recent ones are always on top.


===Nomination===
=== Nomination ===


I would like to nominate [[User:Fredg999]] for [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] (he is already an admin currently). The wiki currently has very few active bureaucrats and I think it's a good idea to have at least one more.
I would like to nominate [[User:Fredg999]] for [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] (he is already an admin currently). The wiki currently has very few active bureaucrats and I think it's a good idea to have at least one more.
Line 21: Line 21:
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)


===Support===
=== Support ===
# '''Support'''. As a nominator. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. As a nominator. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Absolutely. – [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Absolutely. – [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Line 34: Line 34:
# '''Support'''. I think Fred will prove good at this job based on my own experiences with him. [[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. I think Fred will prove good at this job based on my own experiences with him. [[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)


===Oppose===
=== Oppose ===


===Neutral===
=== Neutral ===
# '''Neutral.''' Meh. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]])
# '''Neutral.''' Meh. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]])


===Comments===
=== Comments ===
The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)


Line 73: Line 73:


: Bureaucrats are important but the job itself is not very demanding. For reference, the whole of English Wikipedia only has 16 active bureaucrats currently (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Current_bureaucrats]]). – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
: Bureaucrats are important but the job itself is not very demanding. For reference, the whole of English Wikipedia only has 16 active bureaucrats currently (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Current_bureaucrats]]). – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
=== Result ===
[[User: Fredg999|Fredg999]] is elected a bureaucrat following overwhelmingly positive community reactions. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)