Talk:5120/5103: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:43, 18 September 2025 view source Lériendil (talk \| contribs) 8,044 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:51, 22 January 2026 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 24,074 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:: I think referencing the Pell sequence makes way more sense for a member of the family of commas going 50/49, 289/288, 1682/1681, 9801/9800, etc. The only relation of Pell numbers to 5120/5103 is the edo sequence, which seems rather secondary, as much as I'm a promoter of 239edo. --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 22:42, 18 September 2025 (UTC)		:: I think referencing the Pell sequence makes way more sense for a member of the family of commas going 50/49, 289/288, 1682/1681, 9801/9800, etc. The only relation of Pell numbers to 5120/5103 is the edo sequence, which seems rather secondary, as much as I'm a promoter of 239edo. --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 22:42, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

			Should we do a poll here? The name was basically pre-maturely changed according to a poll on XA Discord. Besides, we need to decide what to do with the temp's name. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 12:51, 22 January 2026 (UTC)