Undim family: Difference between revisions
Switch to Sintel's badness, WE & CWE tunings |
Naming of unlit and twilight |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* [[CWE]]: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.6252{{c}} | * [[CWE]]: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.6252{{c}} | ||
: error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.670 +0.560 }} | : error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.670 +0.560 }} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, …, 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 620, 772, 924c, 1076bc, 1228bc }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, …, 104, 116, 128, 140, 152, 620, 772, 924c, 1076bc, 1228bc }} | ||
| Line 47: | Line 43: | ||
* [[CWE]]: ~25/21 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.7528{{c}} | * [[CWE]]: ~25/21 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.7528{{c}} | ||
: error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.798 -0.078 +0.894 }} | : error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.798 -0.078 +0.894 }} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, …, 128, 140, 152, 292 }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 12, …, 128, 140, 152, 292 }} | ||
| Line 66: | Line 58: | ||
* WE: ~25/21 = 299.9389{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5455{{c}} | * WE: ~25/21 = 299.9389{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5455{{c}} | ||
* CWE: ~25/21 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.7038{{c}} | * CWE: ~25/21 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.7038{{c}} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 128e, 140, 152, 292, 444d, 596d }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12, 128e, 140, 152, 292, 444d, 596d }} | ||
| Line 83: | Line 73: | ||
* WE: ~25/21 = 299.9476{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.6135{{c}} | * WE: ~25/21 = 299.9476{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.6135{{c}} | ||
* CWE: ~25/21 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.7480{{c}} | * CWE: ~25/21 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.7480{{c}} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 128ef, 140, 152f, 292 }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 12f, 128ef, 140, 152f, 292 }} | ||
| Line 91: | Line 79: | ||
== Unlit == | == Unlit == | ||
Unlit tempers out 4375/4374, the [[ragisma]], and may be described as {{nowrap| 152 & 164 }}. This temperament is more faithful to the 5-limit optimal tuning, but comes with the cost of a much higher complexity. | Unlit tempers out 4375/4374, the [[ragisma]], and may be described as {{nowrap| 152 & 164 }}. This temperament is more faithful to the 5-limit optimal tuning, but comes with the cost of a much higher complexity. It was named by [[Flora Canou]] in 2021 for it is some sort of opposite of [[#Septimal undim|septimal undim]]. | ||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7 | ||
| Line 104: | Line 92: | ||
* [[CWE]]: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5716{{c}} | * [[CWE]]: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5716{{c}} | ||
: error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.617 +0.828 +0.607 }} | : error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.617 +0.828 +0.607 }} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 316, 468, 620, 1088bcd, 1708bccdd }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 316, 468, 620, 1088bcd, 1708bccdd }} | ||
| Line 123: | Line 107: | ||
* WE: ~1215/1024 = 299.9426{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.4482{{c}} | * WE: ~1215/1024 = 299.9426{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.4482{{c}} | ||
* CWE: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5772{{c}} | * CWE: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5772{{c}} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152, 468, 620 }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152, 468, 620 }} | ||
| Line 140: | Line 122: | ||
* WE: ~1215/1024 = 299.9452{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.4459{{c}} | * WE: ~1215/1024 = 299.9452{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.4459{{c}} | ||
* CWE: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5703{{c}} | * CWE: ~1215/1024 = 300.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5703{{c}} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152f, 316, 468, 620f, 1088bcdf }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152f, 316, 468, 620f, 1088bcdf }} | ||
| Line 148: | Line 128: | ||
== Twilight == | == Twilight == | ||
Twilight tempers out 6144/6125, the [[porwell comma]], and may be described as {{nowrap| 152 & 176 }}. It splits the period of undim into 1/8 of an octave, and has a [[ploidacot]] of octaploid monocot. | Twilight tempers out 6144/6125, the [[porwell comma]], and may be described as {{nowrap| 152 & 176 }}. It splits the period of undim into 1/8 of an octave, and has a [[ploidacot]] of octaploid monocot. It was named by [[Flora Canou]] in 2021 for it splits the period in halves to reconcile the different mappings of [[#Septimal undim|septimal undim]] and [[#Unlit|unlit]]. | ||
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7 | [[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7 | ||
| Line 162: | Line 142: | ||
* [[CWE]]: ~7168/6561 = 150.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5023{{c}} | * [[CWE]]: ~7168/6561 = 150.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5023{{c}} | ||
: error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.547 +1.175 +1.192 }} | : error map: {{val| 0.000 +0.547 +1.175 +1.192 }} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 328, 480, 1592bccddd }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 152, 328, 480, 1592bccddd }} | ||
| Line 181: | Line 157: | ||
* WE: ~12/11 = 149.9593{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.3182{{c}} | * WE: ~12/11 = 149.9593{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.3182{{c}} | ||
* CWE: ~12/11 = 150.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5022{{c}} | * CWE: ~12/11 = 150.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.5022{{c}} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152, 328, 480, 1112bccddee, 1592bccdddeee }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152, 328, 480, 1112bccddee, 1592bccdddeee }} | ||
| Line 198: | Line 172: | ||
* WE: ~12/11 = 149.9582{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.2815{{c}} | * WE: ~12/11 = 149.9582{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.2815{{c}} | ||
* CWE: ~12/11 = 150.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.4670{{c}} | * CWE: ~12/11 = 150.0000{{c}}, ~3/2 = 702.4670{{c}} | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152f, 328, 480f, 808cdeff }} | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 152f, 328, 480f, 808cdeff }} | ||