Xenharmonic Wiki:Elections: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 7:

You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.

==Fredg999==

== Fredg999 for bureaucrat (Oct 2025) ==

===Nomination===

Voting is open for 1 week after the 3rd vote has been cast. Voting is now closed.

Please place any future elections above this one, so that the most recent ones are always on top.

=== Nomination ===

I would like to nominate [[User:Fredg999]] for [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] (he is already an admin currently). The wiki currently has very few active bureaucrats and I think it's a good idea to have at least one more.

Line 17:

Line 21:

– [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

===Support===

=== Support ===

# '''Support'''. As a nominator. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

# '''Support'''. Absolutely. – [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Line 30:

Line 34:

# '''Support'''. I think Fred will prove good at this job based on my own experiences with him. [[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

===Oppose===

=== Oppose ===

===Neutral===

=== Neutral ===

# '''Neutral.''' Meh. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]])

===Comments===

=== Comments ===

The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Line 67:

Line 71:

:: In addition, I would think that Ganaram Inukshuk and Sintel would make good admins. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

: Bureaucrats are important but the job itself is not very demanding. For reference, the whole of English Wikipedia only has 16 active bureaucrats currently (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Current_bureaucrats]]). – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

=== Result ===

[[User: Fredg999|Fredg999]] is elected a bureaucrat following overwhelmingly positive community reactions. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 You can also add comments or questions for the candidate under 'comments'.
-==Fredg999==
+== Fredg999 for bureaucrat (Oct 2025) ==
-===Nomination===
+Voting is open for 1 week after the 3rd vote has been cast. Voting is now closed.
+Please place any future elections above this one, so that the most recent ones are always on top.
+=== Nomination ===
 I would like to nominate [[User:Fredg999]] for [[Xenharmonic_Wiki:Bureaucrats|bureaucrat]] (he is already an admin currently). The wiki currently has very few active bureaucrats and I think it's a good idea to have at least one more.
@@ Line 17: / Line 21: @@
 – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
-===Support===
+=== Support ===
 # '''Support'''. As a nominator. – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
 # '''Support'''. Absolutely. – [[User:Xenoindex|Xenoindex]] ([[User talk:Xenoindex|talk]]) 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
@@ Line 30: / Line 34: @@
 # '''Support'''. I think Fred will prove good at this job based on my own experiences with him. [[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-===Oppose===
+=== Oppose ===
-===Neutral===
+=== Neutral ===
 # '''Neutral.''' Meh. [[User:Fitzgerald Lee|Fitzgerald Lee]] ([[User talk:Fitzgerald Lee|talk]])
-===Comments===
+=== Comments ===
 The one and only problem I see so far is that if we don't have enough bureaucrats, Fred could be overloaded- especially since he seems to be so busy as is- so we need to nominate at least one to two more bureaucrats. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 05:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
@@ Line 67: / Line 71: @@
 :: In addition, I would think that Ganaram Inukshuk and Sintel would make good admins. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
+: Bureaucrats are important but the job itself is not very demanding. For reference, the whole of English Wikipedia only has 16 active bureaucrats currently (see [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Current_bureaucrats]]). – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 18:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
+=== Result ===
+[[User: Fredg999|Fredg999]] is elected a bureaucrat following overwhelmingly positive community reactions. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)