User talk:TallKite: Difference between revisions

Line 291:

::: Thank you, Kite. I tested two recent applications, including the one you are talking about, and found that it was my fault: my usual warning on the browser capabilities is lost. I'll put it right, and then the recommendations/requirements to the browser will be exposed to the user. For the record: the applications are claimed "under development".

::: Now, two lattices: this is how I try to play with different ideas of presenting the lattices with more keys in a window; and this is one of the things I wanted to discuss with you. My initial idea (~~ears~~ ago :-) was to overcome the limitation of the rational-number tonal systems in terms of the ability to transpose and play different tonalities in the same piece. The idea was to have the keyboard re-tuned on the fly, depending on a chosen tonality. Of course, the idea itself is questionable. For example, it is not suitable for atonal music. Now I'm returning to the idea in different forms. First of all, this is research. As you may have guessed, more than playing in different octaves, I'm concerned with the more fundamental problem of the possibility of harmonic modulation with such tonal systems. With two lattices, we have more nicely used room on a page and can experiment with two different tunings at the same time, changing the tunings independently. Or something like that. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Saturday 2020 December 12, 16:07 UTC''

::: Now, two lattices: this is how I try to play with different ideas of presenting the lattices with more keys in a window; and this is one of the things I wanted to discuss with you. My initial idea (years ago :-) was to overcome the limitation of the rational-number tonal systems in terms of the ability to transpose and play different tonalities in the same piece. The idea was to have the keyboard re-tuned on the fly, depending on a chosen tonality. Of course, the idea itself is questionable. For example, it is not suitable for atonal music. Now I'm returning to the idea in different forms. First of all, this is research. As you may have guessed, more than playing in different octaves, I'm concerned with the more fundamental problem of the possibility of harmonic modulation with such tonal systems. With two lattices, we have more nicely used room on a page and can experiment with two different tunings at the same time, changing the tunings independently. Or something like that. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Saturday 2020 December 12, 16:07 UTC''

::: The notation with "ab" and 1, 2 is mine, I have some rationale about it. Something symmetrically between A and B is ab, not flat or sharp. Flat or sharp should be the tone closer to the "letter" tone. If you have 5 tones in between, you have two sharps, two flats, and one symmetrically in between. I'll review your ups and downs notation, then we can discuss it later. — [[User:SAKryukov|SA]], ''Saturday 2020 December 12, 16:06 UTC''

@@ Line 291: / Line 291: @@
 ::: Thank you, Kite. I tested two recent applications, including the one you are talking about, and found that it was my fault: my usual warning on the browser capabilities is lost. I'll put it right, and then the recommendations/requirements to the browser will be exposed to the user. For the record: the applications are claimed "under development".
-::: Now, two lattices: this is how I try to play with different ideas of presenting the lattices with more keys in a window; and this is one of the things I wanted to discuss with you. My initial idea (ears ago :-) was to overcome the limitation of the rational-number tonal systems in terms of the ability to transpose and play different tonalities in the same piece. The idea was to have the keyboard re-tuned on the fly, depending on a chosen tonality. Of course, the idea itself is questionable. For example, it is not suitable for atonal music. Now I'm returning to the idea in different forms. First of all, this is research. As you may have guessed, more than playing in different octaves, I'm concerned with the more fundamental problem of the possibility of harmonic modulation with such tonal systems. With two lattices, we have more nicely used room on a page and can experiment with two different tunings at the same time, changing the tunings independently. Or something like that. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:SAKryukov|SA]],&nbsp;''Saturday&nbsp;2020&nbsp;December&nbsp;12,&nbsp;16:07&nbsp;UTC''
+::: Now, two lattices: this is how I try to play with different ideas of presenting the lattices with more keys in a window; and this is one of the things I wanted to discuss with you. My initial idea (years ago :-) was to overcome the limitation of the rational-number tonal systems in terms of the ability to transpose and play different tonalities in the same piece. The idea was to have the keyboard re-tuned on the fly, depending on a chosen tonality. Of course, the idea itself is questionable. For example, it is not suitable for atonal music. Now I'm returning to the idea in different forms. First of all, this is research. As you may have guessed, more than playing in different octaves, I'm concerned with the more fundamental problem of the possibility of harmonic modulation with such tonal systems. With two lattices, we have more nicely used room on a page and can experiment with two different tunings at the same time, changing the tunings independently. Or something like that. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:SAKryukov|SA]],&nbsp;''Saturday&nbsp;2020&nbsp;December&nbsp;12,&nbsp;16:07&nbsp;UTC''
 ::: The notation with "ab" and 1, 2 is mine, I have some rationale about it. Something symmetrically between A and B is ab, not flat or sharp. Flat or sharp should be the tone closer to the "letter" tone. If you have 5 tones in between, you have two sharps, two flats, and one symmetrically in between. I'll review your ups and downs notation, then we can discuss it later. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:SAKryukov|SA]],&nbsp;''Saturday&nbsp;2020&nbsp;December&nbsp;12,&nbsp;16:06&nbsp;UTC''