Talk:Kite's ups and downs notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Hey Kite, I saw your new section, and I must say that while many microtonalists who work with 159edo would be familiar with 53edo, I should point out that in my case, that familiarity is only passing, as when I was searching for a good edo to use, it was a combination of [[3-limit]], [[5-limit]] and [[11-limit]] considerations that brought me to 159edo, and as 53-edo doesn't have a good 11-limit, I ended up skipping over it, jumping over from 94edo. Not only that, but I'm currently in the process of writing a song that uses an approximation of 159edo as a basis for retunings of other EDOs. Accordingly, you might want to edit your comments on who might work with it... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | Hey Kite, I saw your new section, and I must say that while many microtonalists who work with 159edo would be familiar with 53edo, I should point out that in my case, that familiarity is only passing, as when I was searching for a good edo to use, it was a combination of [[3-limit]], [[5-limit]] and [[11-limit]] considerations that brought me to 159edo, and as 53-edo doesn't have a good 11-limit, I ended up skipping over it, jumping over from 94edo. Not only that, but I'm currently in the process of writing a song that uses an approximation of 159edo as a basis for retunings of other EDOs. Accordingly, you might want to edit your comments on who might work with it... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
Did I mention that I got my start in microtonality with 24edo of all things? Considering that this means I'm already a significant exception to your presumption due to currently being engaged in a significant share of the pioneering work, and considering the fact I'm trying to make 159edo accessible for people like me who otherwise | Did I mention that I got my start in microtonality with 24edo of all things? Considering that this means I'm already a significant exception to your presumption due to currently being engaged in a significant share of the pioneering work, and considering the fact I'm trying to make 159edo accessible for people like me who are otherwise more resistant to the idea of detwelvulating, don't be surprised if 159edo eventually proves to be more than just a simple relative of 53edo. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | ||