Talk:Kite's ups and downs notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Birthday unprotection== | ==Birthday unprotection== | ||
Did you intentionally make the page unprotect at my 14th birthday (2018-11-08)? [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[Editor PiotrGrochowski|info]], [[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/PiotrGrochowski|contribs]]) 05:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC) | Did you intentionally make the page unprotect at my 14th birthday (2018-11-08)? [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[Editor PiotrGrochowski|info]], [[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/PiotrGrochowski|contribs]]) 05:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
== About those who work with extremely large EDOs == | |||
Hey Kite, I saw your new section, and I must say that while many microtonalists who work with 159edo would be familiar with 53edo, I should point out that in my case, that familiarity is only passing, as when I was searching for a good edo to use, it was a combination of [[3-limit]], [[5-limit]] and [[11-limit]] considerations that brought me to 159edo, and as 53-edo doesn't have a good 11-limit, I ended up skipping over it, jumping over from 94edo. Not only that, but I'm currently in the process of writing a song that uses an approximation of 159edo as a basis for retunings of other EDOs. Accordingly, you might want to edit your comments on who might work with it... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC) | |||