|
|
| Line 489: |
Line 489: |
|
| |
|
| == Your change to the chord name == | | == Your change to the chord name == |
| Why did you change the subharmonic seventh chord from 1/(9:7:6:5) to 1/(7:6:5:4)? 1/(7:6:5:4) is a half-diminished chord that doesn't even include a perfect fifth. Also, the subharmonic ninth chord 1/(9:7:6:5:4) should extend the subharmonic seventh chord, so if 1/(7:6:5:4) is the subharmonic seventh chord, then 1/(9:7:6:5:4) can't be the subharmonic ninth chord. Finally, before the change, the harmonic sixth chord inverted to the subharmonic seventh chord and the harmonic seventh chord inverted to the subharmonic sixth chord. Your change broke this neat symmetry. Because of all these reasons, I think the change should be reverted. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
| | Plz take a look at Talk:60:70:84:105 and consider my reasons. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC) (last updated [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:58, 11 March 2026 (UTC)) |