Talk:19edo: Difference between revisions

ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
"Bad-tasted edit": new section
Line 12: Line 12:


: Working on this wiki for more than 10 years, I'm well aware that around 1000 pages follow the <code>''n''edo</code> pattern. What I'm trying to do is improve the accessibility to public readers (people that come from search engines or Wikipedia). What I think should be secondary is if it's comfortable for people who already know what this all is about. Please join the discussion under [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions #EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos)]]. (BTW maybe <code>''n''-edo</code> could be a solution that fits all?) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
: Working on this wiki for more than 10 years, I'm well aware that around 1000 pages follow the <code>''n''edo</code> pattern. What I'm trying to do is improve the accessibility to public readers (people that come from search engines or Wikipedia). What I think should be secondary is if it's comfortable for people who already know what this all is about. Please join the discussion under [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions #EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos)]]. (BTW maybe <code>''n''-edo</code> could be a solution that fits all?) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
== "Bad-tasted edit" ==
???? How was rewriting the 19edo theory section "bad-tasted"? I just wanted to rewrite that section to be consistent with the way I explained tunings like 5edo and 7edo. -- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 16:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Return to "19edo" page.