SAKryukov (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 169: Line 169:


::: Maybe, but if you want more, as you seem to say, we need to cover more of the modes I know. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
::: Maybe, but if you want more, as you seem to say, we need to cover more of the modes I know. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
::: I'm curious... what is it about my diatonic scale system that appeals to you?  It's true that in addition to the diatonic scales, we need to cover the other scales I've mentioned, but still... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 19:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


:: For example, let me ask you: can you, for example, having a simple composition, introduce a harmonic modulation by moving from one scale to another in the same piece? I think it is possible. Anyway, it's easier to implement and show than to explain. :-)
:: For example, let me ask you: can you, for example, having a simple composition, introduce a harmonic modulation by moving from one scale to another in the same piece? I think it is possible. Anyway, it's easier to implement and show than to explain. :-)