Talk:159edo/Notation: Difference between revisions

Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 152: Line 152:
:::::::: I'm perfectly aware of the fact that two "semitones" add up to more than a "whole tone" in this system- the same problem on a different level, as they are ''still'' called "semitones" in spite of this- but we seem to have a way of getting around that in this and other systems by means of the double sharp and double flat accidentals...  I guess you could say that I now want to come up with a similar solution for these "quartertones".  Alternatively, we should  not only mention that the "quartertones" aren't exactly "quartertones", but also that the "semitones" aren't exactly "semitones"... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::::: I'm perfectly aware of the fact that two "semitones" add up to more than a "whole tone" in this system- the same problem on a different level, as they are ''still'' called "semitones" in spite of this- but we seem to have a way of getting around that in this and other systems by means of the double sharp and double flat accidentals...  I guess you could say that I now want to come up with a similar solution for these "quartertones".  Alternatively, we should  not only mention that the "quartertones" aren't exactly "quartertones", but also that the "semitones" aren't exactly "semitones"... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)


:::::::: Either way you look at it, and regardless of the option we choose, 33/32 is to the 11-limit what the apotome is to the 3-limit... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
:::::::: Either way you look at it, and regardless of the option we choose, 33/32 is to the 11-limit what the apotome is to the 3-limit in terms of its importance... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Return to "159edo/Notation" page.