Inthar (talk | contribs)
Aura (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 98: Line 98:
:: Oh, and thanks for providing me with the link.  I think I'll go ahead and use the site to perform my calculations on various EDOs, but still, after that mistake on my part, I don't think we can be too careful. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
:: Oh, and thanks for providing me with the link.  I think I'll go ahead and use the site to perform my calculations on various EDOs, but still, after that mistake on my part, I don't think we can be too careful. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
:::44edo does temper it out, but it's contorted 22edo in the 2.3.7.11 subgroup (the patent val is {{val|44, 70, 124, 152}} which is twice 22edo's patent val) so it's redundant. [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 16:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
:::44edo does temper it out, but it's contorted 22edo in the 2.3.7.11 subgroup (the patent val is {{val|44, 70, 124, 152}} which is twice 22edo's patent val) so it's redundant. [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 16:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
:::: Okay, I didn't know that 44edo was contorted, as the entry on the wiki didn't say so.  However, I don't think EDOs that are multiples of other established EDOs are necessarily redundant examples as because of their additional notes, they may yet offer additional possibilities. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 17:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)