User talk:Inthar: Difference between revisions

Line 89:

:::::: That does explain a lot. Do you think we ought to make pages on both the quartisma and its temperament family? --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 14:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hey Inthar, remember how we we initially included 46edo in the list of quartismic EDOs? Well, I did the math about a half an , and 46edo failed the monzo test- instead of getting a result of "0" like you would if 46edo tempered out the quartisma, I ended up getting a result of "-1"... and Flora's computer calculations didn't catch this until now... Looks like we all screwed up on this one. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:49, 7 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:17, 8 September 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 89:		Line 89:

	:::::: That does explain a lot. Do you think we ought to make pages on both the quartisma and its temperament family? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 14:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)		:::::: That does explain a lot. Do you think we ought to make pages on both the quartisma and its temperament family? --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 14:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

			Hey Inthar, remember how we we initially included 46edo in the list of quartismic EDOs? Well, I did the math about a half an , and 46edo failed the monzo test- instead of getting a result of "0" like you would if 46edo tempered out the quartisma, I ended up getting a result of "-1"... and Flora's computer calculations didn't catch this until now... Looks like we all screwed up on this one. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)