MOS scale: Difference between revisions

Line 12:

== Examples ==

The most widely used MOS scale is the [[5L 2s|diatonic scale]]. It has 7 steps: 5 large ones (major 2nds) and 2 small ones (minor 2nds), and thus is named 5L 2s. The major mode is LLsLLLs. The other modes are rotations of this pattern (e.g. LsLLsLL is the minor mode).

{| class="wikitable"

|+ style="font-size: 105%;" | Interval classes in the 5L 2s MOS scale

Line 73:

Line 74:

== Periods and generators ==

Every MOS scale can be ''generated'' by stacking a certain interval called the [[generator]] and octave-reducing (or more generally, [[period]]-reducing). For example, the diatonic scale is generated by stacking 6 fifths (or equivalently, 6 fourths) and octave-reducing to get a 7 note scale. Another example, 2L 3s is generated by stacking 4 fifths to get 5 notes. However, stacking 5 fifths to get a hexatonic scale such as C D E F G A C does not produces a MOS, because there are more than 2 sizes of each interval class.

Every MOS scale can be ''generated'' by stacking a certain interval called the [[generator]] and octave-reducing (or more generally, [[period]]-reducing). For example, the diatonic scale is generated by stacking 6 fifths (or equivalently, 6 fourths) and octave-reducing to get a 7 note scale. Another example, 2L 3s is generated by stacking 4 fifths to get 5 notes. However, stacking 5 fifths to get a hexatonic scale such as {{nowrap|C D E F G A C}} does not produces a MOS, because there are more than 2 sizes of each interval class.

The amount of stacking that produces a MOS scale depends only on the size of the generator relative to the size to the period. For a just fifth and a just octave, the valid scale sizes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 17, 29, 41, 53... However for a quarter-comma meantone fifth, the valid sizes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 19, 31, 50...

Line 81:

Line 82:

When the step ratio is a rational number, the MOS is tuned to an edo. A counter-example is 5L 2s tuned to quarter-comma meantone, which has a step ratio of about 1.649.

{| class="wikitable"

|+ style="font-size: 105%;" | 5L 2s step ratios in various edos

Line 117:

Line 119:

Sometimes, scales are defined with respect to a period and an additional [[equivalence interval]], the interval at which pitch classes repeat. MOSes in which the equivalence interval is a multiple of the period, and in which there is more than one period per equivalence interval, are sometimes called '''Multi-MOSes'''. For example, a MOS with a half-octave period is called a '''2mos''', with a 1/3-octave period a '''3mos''', and so on. MOSes in which the equivalence interval is equal to the period are sometimes called '''Strict MOSes'''. MOSes in which the equivalence interval and period are simply disjunct, with no rational relationship between them, are simply MOS and have no additional distinguishing label.

With a few notable exceptions, Wilson generally focused his attention on MOS with period equal to the equivalence interval. Hence, some people prefer to use the term [[Distributional evenness|distributionally even scale]], with acronym DE, for the more general class of scales which are MOS with respect to other intervals. MOS/DE scales are also sometimes known as ''well-formed scales'', the term used in the 1989 paper by Norman Carey and David Clampitt<ref>Norman Carey and David Clampitt. "Aspects of Well-Formed Scales", ''Music Theory Spectrum'', Vol. 11, No. 2 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 187-206.</ref>. A great deal of work has been done in academic circles extending these ideas. The idea of MOS also includes secondary or bi-level MOS scales which are actually the inspiration of Wilson's concept. They are in a sense the MOS of MOS patterns. This is used to explain the [[Pentatonic|pentatonics]] used in traditional [[Japanese music]] (e.g. A B C E F A), where the 5-tone cycles are derived from a 7-tone MOS, which are not found in the concept of DE.

With a few notable exceptions, Wilson generally focused his attention on MOS with period equal to the equivalence interval. Hence, some people prefer to use the term [[Distributional evenness|distributionally even scale]], with acronym DE, for the more general class of scales which are MOS with respect to other intervals. MOS/DE scales are also sometimes known as ''well-formed scales'', the term used in the 1989 paper by Norman Carey and David Clampitt<ref>Norman Carey and David Clampitt. "Aspects of Well-Formed Scales", ''Music Theory Spectrum'', Vol. 11, No. 2 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 187-206.</ref>. A great deal of work has been done in academic circles extending these ideas. The idea of MOS also includes secondary or bi-level MOS scales which are actually the inspiration of Wilson's concept. They are in a sense the MOS of MOS patterns. This is used to explain the [[Pentatonic|pentatonics]] used in traditional [[Japanese music]] (e.g. {{nowrap|A B C E F A}}), where the 5-tone cycles are derived from a 7-tone MOS, which are not found in the concept of DE.

== Equivalent definitions and generalizations ==

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 == Examples ==
 The most widely used MOS scale is the [[5L 2s|diatonic scale]]. It has 7 steps: 5 large ones (major 2nds) and 2 small ones (minor 2nds), and thus is named 5L&nbsp;2s. The major mode is LLsLLLs. The other modes are rotations of this pattern (e.g. LsLLsLL is the minor mode).
 {| class="wikitable"
 |+ style="font-size: 105%;" | Interval classes in the 5L&nbsp;2s MOS scale
@@ Line 73: / Line 74: @@
 == Periods and generators ==
-Every MOS scale can be ''generated'' by stacking a certain interval called the [[generator]] and octave-reducing (or more generally, [[period]]-reducing). For example, the diatonic scale is generated by stacking 6 fifths (or equivalently, 6 fourths) and octave-reducing to get a 7 note scale. Another example, 2L&nbsp;3s is generated by stacking 4 fifths to get 5 notes. However, stacking 5 fifths to get a hexatonic scale such as C D E F G A C does not produces a MOS, because there are more than 2 sizes of each interval class.
+Every MOS scale can be ''generated'' by stacking a certain interval called the [[generator]] and octave-reducing (or more generally, [[period]]-reducing). For example, the diatonic scale is generated by stacking 6 fifths (or equivalently, 6 fourths) and octave-reducing to get a 7 note scale. Another example, 2L&nbsp;3s is generated by stacking 4 fifths to get 5 notes. However, stacking 5 fifths to get a hexatonic scale such as {{nowrap|C D E F G A C}} does not produces a MOS, because there are more than 2 sizes of each interval class.
 The amount of stacking that produces a MOS scale depends only on the size of the generator relative to the size to the period. For a just fifth and a just octave, the valid scale sizes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 17, 29, 41, 53... However for a quarter-comma meantone fifth, the valid sizes are 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 19, 31, 50...
@@ Line 81: / Line 82: @@
 When the step ratio is a rational number, the MOS is tuned to an edo. A counter-example is 5L&nbsp;2s tuned to quarter-comma meantone, which has a step ratio of about 1.649.
 {| class="wikitable"
 |+ style="font-size: 105%;" | 5L&nbsp;2s step ratios in various edos
@@ Line 117: / Line 119: @@
 Sometimes, scales are defined with respect to a period and an additional [[equivalence interval]], the interval at which pitch classes repeat. MOSes in which the equivalence interval is a multiple of the period, and in which there is more than one period per equivalence interval, are sometimes called '''Multi-MOSes'''. For example, a MOS with a half-octave period is called a '''2mos''', with a 1/3-octave period a '''3mos''', and so on. MOSes in which the equivalence interval is equal to the period are sometimes called '''Strict MOSes'''. MOSes in which the equivalence interval and period are simply disjunct, with no rational relationship between them, are simply MOS and have no additional distinguishing label.
-With a few notable exceptions, Wilson generally focused his attention on MOS with period equal to the equivalence interval. Hence, some people prefer to use the term [[Distributional evenness|distributionally even scale]], with acronym DE, for the more general class of scales which are MOS with respect to other intervals. MOS/DE scales are also sometimes known as ''well-formed scales'', the term used in the 1989 paper by Norman Carey and David Clampitt<ref>Norman Carey and David Clampitt. "Aspects of Well-Formed Scales", ''Music Theory Spectrum'', Vol. 11, No. 2 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 187-206.</ref>. A great deal of work has been done in academic circles extending these ideas. The idea of MOS also includes secondary or bi-level MOS scales which are actually the inspiration of Wilson's concept. They are in a sense the MOS of MOS patterns. This is used to explain the [[Pentatonic|pentatonics]] used in traditional [[Japanese music]] (e.g. A B C E F A), where the 5-tone cycles are derived from a 7-tone MOS, which are not found in the concept of DE.
+With a few notable exceptions, Wilson generally focused his attention on MOS with period equal to the equivalence interval. Hence, some people prefer to use the term [[Distributional evenness|distributionally even scale]], with acronym DE, for the more general class of scales which are MOS with respect to other intervals. MOS/DE scales are also sometimes known as ''well-formed scales'', the term used in the 1989 paper by Norman Carey and David Clampitt<ref>Norman Carey and David Clampitt. "Aspects of Well-Formed Scales", ''Music Theory Spectrum'', Vol. 11, No. 2 (Autumn, 1989), pp. 187-206.</ref>. A great deal of work has been done in academic circles extending these ideas. The idea of MOS also includes secondary or bi-level MOS scales which are actually the inspiration of Wilson's concept. They are in a sense the MOS of MOS patterns. This is used to explain the [[Pentatonic|pentatonics]] used in traditional [[Japanese music]] (e.g. {{nowrap|A B C E F A}}), where the 5-tone cycles are derived from a 7-tone MOS, which are not found in the concept of DE.
 == Equivalent definitions and generalizations ==