Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Revision proposal by Budjarn ver. 2 (Oct 2025): Accept Unque's amendment |
||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
: The elaboration, I strongly agree with. My only complaint is that I would prefer to keep "[[musical tuning]]" over "[[microtonal music]]," as plenty of the tunings discussed on the wiki would be classed as "macrotonal," or even regular-sized-tonal; even 12edo itself is covered here. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 21:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC) | : The elaboration, I strongly agree with. My only complaint is that I would prefer to keep "[[musical tuning]]" over "[[microtonal music]]," as plenty of the tunings discussed on the wiki would be classed as "macrotonal," or even regular-sized-tonal; even 12edo itself is covered here. [[User:Unque|Unque]] ([[User talk:Unque|talk]]) 21:39, 7 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
:: I am happy to change that. So in that case it would be: | |||
:: ''New proposed wording:'' | |||
:: "The Xenharmonic Wiki is an open resource for information about [[musical tuning]]: primarily [[xenharmonic music]] but also [[historical tunings]] and those of [[world musical traditions]]. This information includes tuning systems and their relationships, [[theory]], [[math]], and [[practice]]." | |||