Talk:19edo: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) m Undid revision 190623 by Fredg999 (talk)—{{high priority}} is similar to Wikipedia's {{more citations needed}} and goes on the article, not the talk page Tag: Undo |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) Undid revision 190734 by ArrowHead294 (talk)—never mind |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | {{WSArchiveLink}} | ||
{{High priority}} | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Percentage precision == | == Percentage precision == | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
== Page name change == | == Page name change == | ||
I see that [[User:Xenwolf]] has moved this article from "19edo" to "19-EDO". The same happened to the 12edo page, and possibly others. But this change is not consistent at all across pages. The justification for this change was that it's more common to write it this way, but in practice I've seen "Nedo" far more than "N-EDO". But my perspective as a Discord user could be limiting me there. "EDO is actually an abbreviation and the number in front of it can be grasped at a glance" is the other reason given, which I don't think is sound when the acronym is explained right in the header. I would like to hear more of a reason why Xenwolf did this, and whether any other people were involved. --[[User:SupahstarSaga]] | I see that [[User:Xenwolf]] has moved this article from "19edo" to "19-EDO". The same happened to the 12edo page, and possibly others. But this change is not consistent at all across pages. The justification for this change was that it's more common to write it this way, but in practice I've seen "Nedo" far more than "N-EDO". But my perspective as a Discord user could be limiting me there. "EDO is actually an abbreviation and the number in front of it can be grasped at a glance" is the other reason given, which I don't think is sound when the acronym is explained right in the header. I would like to hear more of a reason why Xenwolf did this, and whether any other people were involved. --[[User:SupahstarSaga]] | ||
: Working on this wiki for more than 10 years, I'm well aware that around 1000 pages follow the <code>''n''edo</code> pattern. What I'm trying to do is improve the accessibility to public readers (people that come from search engines or Wikipedia). What I think should be secondary is if it's comfortable for people who already know what this all is about. Please join the discussion under [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions #EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos)]]. (BTW maybe <code>''n''-edo</code> could be a solution that fits all?) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | : Working on this wiki for more than 10 years, I'm well aware that around 1000 pages follow the <code>''n''edo</code> pattern. What I'm trying to do is improve the accessibility to public readers (people that come from search engines or Wikipedia). What I think should be secondary is if it's comfortable for people who already know what this all is about. Please join the discussion under [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions #EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos)]]. (BTW maybe <code>''n''-edo</code> could be a solution that fits all?) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | ||