Talk:72edo: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 10:

::: Are you talking about the number of digits in total- as in throughout the whole ratio? Sorry, but most commas that are well known have ratios of at least three digits per single side of the ratio, so that would be unreasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

:::: Not the total number of digits, just the number of digits in the numerator. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 20:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

::::: In my opinion also a 8-digit (or <abbr title="9-digits would be better, in this case the numerator would start with 1 anyway">9-digit</abbr>) limit would look good in the comma table. See [[41edo#Commas]] for an example. The 10-digit limit was also in use for naming interval pages and redirect lemmas to them. Maybe also this could be changed? BTW: I think for finding a new consensus, we should move this discussion to a better place. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

:::::: I like what you did with the 41edo table, --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 22:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

: I heard these tables are generated by scala, aren't they? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

:: Yes it seems so to me, I also darkly remember reading that somewhere. But I'd like to understand the criteria without looking at scale. Do you see chances to get there? BTW: I have scala installed, I tried to get this list but with no success so far. If anyone knows scala, please help! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

::: You read that in [[50edo]]: ''This list is not all-inclusive, and is based on the interval table from Scala version 2.2. '' Seems the criteria is simply the presence in the interval table. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ::: Are you talking about the number of digits in total- as in throughout the whole ratio?  Sorry, but most commas that are well known have ratios of at least three digits per single side of the ratio, so that would be unreasonable. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 01:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::: Not the total number of digits, just the number of digits in the numerator. --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 20:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+::::: In my opinion also a 8-digit (or <abbr title="9-digits would be better, in this case the numerator would start with 1 anyway">9-digit</abbr>) limit would look good in the comma table. See [[41edo#Commas]] for an example. The 10-digit limit was also in use for naming interval pages and redirect lemmas to them. Maybe also this could be changed? BTW: I think for finding a new consensus, we should move this discussion to a better place. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+:::::: I like what you did with the 41edo table, --[[User:TallKite|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite|talk]]) 22:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 : I heard these tables are generated by scala, aren't they? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 05:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 :: Yes it seems so to me, I also darkly remember reading that somewhere. But I'd like to understand the criteria without looking at scale. Do you see chances to get there? BTW: I have scala installed, I tried to get this list but with no success so far. If anyone knows scala, please help! --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
+::: You read that in [[50edo]]: ''This list is not all-inclusive, and is based on the interval table from Scala version 2.2. '' Seems the criteria is simply the presence in the interval table. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)