93ed6: Difference between revisions
→Theory: +subsets and supersets |
m Text replacement - "[[The Riemann zeta function and tuning #" to "[[Riemann zeta function #" |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Theory == | == Theory == | ||
93ed6 is nearly identical to [[36edo]], but with the 6th harmonic rather than the [[ | 93ed6 is nearly identical to [[36edo]], but with the 6th harmonic rather than the [[octave]] being just. The octave is stretched by about 0.757 [[cent]]s (almost identical to [[101ed7]], where the octave is stretched by about 0.770 cents). Like 36edo, 93ed6 is [[consistent]] to the [[integer limit|8-integer-limit]]. | ||
Compared to 36edo, 93ed6 is pretty well optimized for the 2.3.7.13.17 [[subgroup]], with slightly better [[3/1|3]], [[7/1|7]], [[13/1|13]] and [[17/1|17]], and a slightly worse 2 versus 36edo. Using the [[patent val]], the [[5/1|5]] is also less accurate. Overall this means 36edo is still better in the [[5-limit]], but 93ed6 is better in the [[13-limit|13-]] and [[17-limit]], especially when treating it as a dual-5 dual-11 tuning. | |||
The local [[Riemann zeta function #Optimal octave stretch|zeta peak]] around 36 is located at 35.982388, which has a step size of 33.3496{{c}} and has octaves stretched by 0.587{{c}}, making 93ed6 very close to optimal for 36edo. | |||
=== Harmonics === | === Harmonics === | ||
| Line 17: | Line 21: | ||
* [[57edt]] – relative edt | * [[57edt]] – relative edt | ||
* [[101ed7]] – relative ed7 | * [[101ed7]] – relative ed7 | ||
* [[129ed12]] – relative ed12 | * [[129ed12]] – relative ed12, close to the zeta-optimized tuning for 36edo | ||
[[Category:36edo]] | |||