Talk:19edo: Difference between revisions

Line 9:

I see that [[User:Xenwolf]] has moved this article from "19edo" to "19-EDO". The same happened to the 12edo page, and possibly others. But this change is not consistent at all across pages. The justification for this change was that it's more common to write it this way, but in practice I've seen "Nedo" far more than "N-EDO". But my perspective as a Discord user could be limiting me there. "EDO is actually an abbreviation and the number in front of it can be grasped at a glance" is the other reason given, which I don't think is sound when the acronym is explained right in the header. I would like to hear more of a reason why Xenwolf did this, and whether any other people were involved. --[[User:SupahstarSaga]]

: Working on this wiki for more than 10 years, I'm well aware that around 1000 pages follow the <code>''n''edo</code> pattern. What I'm trying to do is improve the accessibility to public readers (people that come from search engines or Wikipedia). What I think should be secondary is if it's comfortable for people who already know what this all is about. Please join the discussion under [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions #EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos)]]. (BTW maybe <code>''n''-edo</code> could be a solution that fits all?) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 12:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:18, 12 July 2021 view source SupahstarSaga (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 130 edits m SupahstarSaga moved page Talk:19-EDO to Talk:19edo over redirect: Reversing the recent move for consistency ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:47, 18 July 2021 view source Xenwolf (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops 8,705 edits →Page name change: re Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I see that [[User:Xenwolf]] has moved this article from "19edo" to "19-EDO". The same happened to the 12edo page, and possibly others. But this change is not consistent at all across pages. The justification for this change was that it's more common to write it this way, but in practice I've seen "Nedo" far more than "N-EDO". But my perspective as a Discord user could be limiting me there. "EDO is actually an abbreviation and the number in front of it can be grasped at a glance" is the other reason given, which I don't think is sound when the acronym is explained right in the header. I would like to hear more of a reason why Xenwolf did this, and whether any other people were involved. --[[User:SupahstarSaga]]		I see that [[User:Xenwolf]] has moved this article from "19edo" to "19-EDO". The same happened to the 12edo page, and possibly others. But this change is not consistent at all across pages. The justification for this change was that it's more common to write it this way, but in practice I've seen "Nedo" far more than "N-EDO". But my perspective as a Discord user could be limiting me there. "EDO is actually an abbreviation and the number in front of it can be grasped at a glance" is the other reason given, which I don't think is sound when the acronym is explained right in the header. I would like to hear more of a reason why Xenwolf did this, and whether any other people were involved. --[[User:SupahstarSaga]]

			: Working on this wiki for more than 10 years, I'm well aware that around 1000 pages follow the <code>''n''edo</code> pattern. What I'm trying to do is improve the accessibility to public readers (people that come from search engines or Wikipedia). What I think should be secondary is if it's comfortable for people who already know what this all is about. Please join the discussion under [[Xenharmonic Wiki talk:Conventions #EDO vs. edo (and MOS vs. mos)]]. (BTW maybe <code>''n''-edo</code> could be a solution that fits all?) --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:47, 18 July 2021 (UTC)