User talk:Lhearne: Difference between revisions

Line 76:

:::::::::: Personally, I'd really like to see 159edo being well-ordered in some way, so it sounds like we need to think some other things through as well, especially regarding the 13-limit and 17-limit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:::::::::: Judging from what I know about 94edo, I'd say we need to work with the 23-limit as well. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

::::::::::: R is as good as added as an optionally available prefix in my system, so thanks for that, but I would need to find at least another to add if I want a sort of 'second-tier' extended version, since I would like to be able to work with the whole 13-limit in any small-medium sized edo, extended to medium-large edos (above 72 to like 270 I guess, including 80, 87, 94, and 159, and 63 actually cos I can't do that at the moment). I may be inclined to add a 17-limit prefix. Hmm yeah we'll see about 23-limit. I trust you're right, but I am hesitant for now... Could look to the simpler Sagittal sets to see which ones they use, as they are doing a similar thing --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 04:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 :::::::::: Personally, I'd really like to see 159edo being well-ordered in some way, so it sounds like we need to think some other things through as well, especially regarding the 13-limit and 17-limit. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 :::::::::: Judging from what I know about 94edo, I'd say we need to work with the 23-limit as well. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
+::::::::::: R is as good as added as an optionally available prefix in my system, so thanks for that, but I would need to find at least another to add if I want a sort of 'second-tier' extended version, since I would like to be able to work with the whole 13-limit in any small-medium sized edo, extended to medium-large edos (above 72 to like 270 I guess, including 80, 87, 94, and 159, and 63 actually cos I can't do that at the moment). I may be inclined to add a 17-limit prefix. Hmm yeah we'll see about 23-limit. I trust you're right, but I am hesitant for now... Could look to the simpler Sagittal sets to see which ones they use, as they are doing a similar thing --[[User:Lhearne|Lhearne]] ([[User talk:Lhearne|talk]]) 04:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)