Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
:::::: I can't say anything about that. Considering the precision of 3.7 cents with which any interval is hit in 159edo and the generally accepted detuning degree of 13.7 cents of the major third in 12edo, considerations regarding consistency seem rather remote to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC) | :::::: I can't say anything about that. Considering the precision of 3.7 cents with which any interval is hit in 159edo and the generally accepted detuning degree of 13.7 cents of the major third in 12edo, considerations regarding consistency seem rather remote to me. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 20:47, 17 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
::::::: Actually, if you think about it, the generally accepted detuning of the major third in 12edo still follows the same rules that I'm laying down, as the Meantone comma, which is responsible for that detuning, is smaller than half a step in 12edo, and it's still smaller than half a step in 24edo- even the Pythagorean comma is also less than half of a step in 24edo. However, when you start looking at 36edo, 40edo and 72edo, suddenly, things don't look as good on this front, this is why I moved on from 72edo to another EDO. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:12, 17 January 2021 (UTC) | |||