Xenwolf
Joined 17 September 2018
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
::::: 3125 = 17*159 + 5*46 + 8*24 so we're ok unless it's a non-patent val of 3125 or something. [It's not about the prime factorization of the edo number, it's about whether the edo is a sum of some number of the edos 24, 46 and 159 or not.] [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 04:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | ::::: 3125 = 17*159 + 5*46 + 8*24 so we're ok unless it's a non-patent val of 3125 or something. [It's not about the prime factorization of the edo number, it's about whether the edo is a sum of some number of the edos 24, 46 and 159 or not.] [[User:IlL|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 04:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Okay then... With this knowledge in hand, let's see if we can find other quartismic EDOs... Chances are high that any additional EDOs we find are bound to have ridiculously small step sizes though... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | :::::: Okay then... With this knowledge in hand, let's see if we can find other quartismic EDOs... Chances are high that any additional EDOs we find are bound to have ridiculously small step sizes though... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Oh and before we continue, let's take this to your own talk page, shall we, Inthar? | |||
Sorry about blowing up your talk page Xenwolf... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 04:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC) | |||