Talk:Val: Difference between revisions

Godtone (talk | contribs)
reply and concern about the preimage actually being positive rationals rather than monzos
Line 27: Line 27:


:: No? It's the monzo. But whatever it is, we're essentially mapping the thing and not a representation of the thing. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:39, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
:: No? It's the monzo. But whatever it is, we're essentially mapping the thing and not a representation of the thing. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 08:39, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
::: Hmm, I still genuinely estimate that adding "(aka. [[frequency ratio]]s)" would be helpful for a beginner and do no harm to the state of the page, cuz "frequency ratio" is essentially the beginner word for "interval" if someone isn't accustomed to the meaning of "interval", EG isn't a musician as many new to xen aren't. I also say this coming from the perspective of concern about negative intervals being unintuitive/potentially confusing to get right in technical speech and consideration while a ratio (a rational number) is extremely straightforward. Also, there was some discussion on Discord that "val" actually comes from "p-adic valuation", which suggests that the preimage is a rational number, not a monzo. In light of this, I'm really curious what you think of [this https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_7525.html#7532] which was linked to me by sintel, as it (apparently) concerns the origin of the term "val". --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 09:46, 8 May 2026 (UTC)


> Tunings of interest
> Tunings of interest
Return to "Val" page.