Pythagorean tuning: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Pythagorean tuning was not actually invented by [[Pythagoras of Samos|Pythagoras]]. The earliest records are from [[Mesopotamian music|Ancient Mesopotamia]], and it was later inherited by the [[Ancient Greek]]s. | Pythagorean tuning was not actually invented by [[Pythagoras of Samos|Pythagoras]]. The earliest records are from [[Mesopotamian music|Ancient Mesopotamia]], and it was later inherited by the [[Ancient Greek]]s. | ||
The 12-tone form of Pythagorean tuning was (probably independently) invented in [[Chinese music|Ancient China]] between 600 BCE and 240 CE, where it was called '''shi'er lü'''. | The 12-tone form of Pythagorean tuning was (probably independently) invented in [[Chinese music|Ancient China]] between 600 BCE and 240 CE, where it was called '''shi'er lü'''.{{clear}} | ||
== Relation to temperaments == | == Relation to temperaments == | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Mark Lindley<ref>Mark Lindley, ''Pythagorean Intonation and the Rise of the Triad'', Royal Musical Association Research Chronicle, 1980</ref> argues such a system was used in Europe during the 15th century, with keyboards tuned to nearly pure fifths as | Mark Lindley<ref>Mark Lindley, ''Pythagorean Intonation and the Rise of the Triad'', Royal Musical Association Research Chronicle, 1980</ref> argues such a system was used in Europe during the 15th century, with keyboards tuned to nearly pure fifths as | ||
:{{dash|G♭, D♭, A♭, E♭, B♭, F, C, G, D, A, E, B}}. | : {{dash|G♭, D♭, A♭, E♭, B♭, F, C, G, D, A, E, B}}. | ||
When respelled enharmonically, triads such as {{dash|D, F♯, A}} are close to 4:5:6 in this tuning. | When respelled enharmonically, triads such as {{dash|D, F♯, A}} are close to 4:5:6 in this tuning. | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
== Scales == | == Scales == | ||
Pythagorean tuning generates the following [[MOS]] scales: | Pythagorean tuning generates the following [[MOS]] scales: | ||
* [[Pythagorean5]] – proper [[2L 3s]]. Also known as pythagorean pentic scale | * [[Pythagorean5]] – proper [[2L 3s]]. Also known as pythagorean pentic scale | ||
* [[Pythagorean7]] – improper [[5L 2s]]. Also known as pythagorean diatonic scale | * [[Pythagorean7]] – improper [[5L 2s]]. Also known as pythagorean diatonic scale | ||
* [[Pythagorean12]] – proper [[5L 7s]]. Also known as pythagorean chromatic scale | * [[Pythagorean12]] – proper [[5L 7s]]. Also known as pythagorean chromatic scale | ||
* [[Pythagorean17]] – improper [[12L 5s]]. Also known as pythagorean enharmonic scale | * [[Pythagorean17]] – improper [[12L 5s]]. Also known as pythagorean enharmonic scale | ||
* [[Pythagorean29]] – improper [[12L 17s]] | * [[Pythagorean29]] – improper [[12L 17s]] | ||
* [[Pythagorean41]] – proper [[12L 29s]] | * [[Pythagorean41]] – proper [[12L 29s]] | ||
* [[Pythagorean53]] – proper [[41L 12s]] | * [[Pythagorean53]] – proper [[41L 12s]] | ||
The [[hardness]]es of the Pythagorean scales are about 1.442 for pentic, 2.260 for diatonic, 1.260 for chromatic, and 3.846 for enharmonic. | The [[hardness]]es of the Pythagorean scales are about 1.442 for pentic, 2.260 for diatonic, 1.260 for chromatic, and 3.846 for enharmonic. | ||
== Approaches == | == Approaches == | ||
There are many possible approaches to Pythagorean tuning, and each approach is associated with a different Pythagorean equave. The two most widely-used are [[octave]]-based and [[tritave]]-based Pythagorean. | There are many possible approaches to Pythagorean tuning, and each approach is associated with a different Pythagorean equave. The two most widely-used are [[octave]]-based and [[tritave]]-based Pythagorean. | ||
[[Octave]]-based Pythagorean tuning is essentially how it is used in the common-practice music of the West. This gives MOS sizes of 2, 3, 5 ([[2L 3s]] pentic), 7 ([[5L 2s]] diatonic), 12 ([[5L 7s]] chromatic), 17 ([[12L 5s]] enharmonic), 29, 41, and 53. | [[Octave]]-based Pythagorean tuning is essentially how it is used in the common-practice music of the West. This gives MOS sizes of 2, 3, 5 ([[2L 3s]] pentic), 7 ([[5L 2s]] diatonic), 12 ([[5L 7s]] chromatic), 17 ([[12L 5s]] enharmonic), 29, 41, and 53. | ||
[[Tritave]]-based Pythagorean tuning is an approach described in [https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00375 this paper] by M. Schmidmeier. This gives MOS sizes of 2, 3, 5, 8 (3L 5s), 11 (8L 3s), 19 (8L 11s), 27 (19L 8s), 46, and 65. The 11-note scale can be regarded as the diatonic-like scale of tritave-equivalent Pythagorean, and the 19-note scale can be regarded as its respective chromatic-like scale. | [[Tritave]]-based Pythagorean tuning is an approach described in [https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00375 this paper] by M. Schmidmeier. This gives MOS sizes of 2, 3, 5, 8 (3L 5s), 11 (8L 3s), 19 (8L 11s), 27 (19L 8s), 46, and 65. The 11-note scale can be regarded as the diatonic-like scale of tritave-equivalent Pythagorean, and the 19-note scale can be regarded as its respective chromatic-like scale. | ||
== Music == | == Music == | ||