Lumatone mapping for 91edo: Difference between revisions

Add Bryan Deister's *2* Lumatone mappings for 91edo, along with the obligatory diatonic mappings
 
Yourmusic Productions (talk | contribs)
m Patent mapping should go first.
Line 2: Line 2:


== Diatonic ==
== Diatonic ==
If not for the problem of failing to cove the complete gamut (such as on a hypothetical XL-size Lumatone having at least 485 keys within the span of five octaves), the sharp version would be a respectable mapping for [[https://en.xen.wiki/w/Archytas_clan#Beatles|Beatles]] (as 91bcd); while the flat version would be a respectable [[Meantone]] (91c) or [[Schismic–Pythagorean_equivalence_continuum#Python|Python]] [[patent val]] mapping.
If not for the problem of failing to cover the complete gamut (such as on a hypothetical XL-size Lumatone having at least 485 keys within the span of five octaves), the flat version would be a respectable [[Schismic–Pythagorean_equivalence_continuum#Python|Python]] or [[Meantone]] (91c) mapping, while the sharp version would be a respectable mapping for [[Quasiultra]] (as 91bd).
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=89|xstep=15|ystep=-7}}
 
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=22|xstep=17|ystep=-14}}
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=22|xstep=17|ystep=-14}}
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=89|xstep=15|ystep=-7}}


== Quartkeenlig-related rank-3 mappings ==
== Quartkeenlig-related rank-3 mappings ==