Lumatone mapping for 91edo: Difference between revisions
Add Bryan Deister's *2* Lumatone mappings for 91edo, along with the obligatory diatonic mappings |
m Patent mapping should go first. |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Diatonic == | == Diatonic == | ||
If not for the problem of failing to | If not for the problem of failing to cover the complete gamut (such as on a hypothetical XL-size Lumatone having at least 485 keys within the span of five octaves), the flat version would be a respectable [[Schismic–Pythagorean_equivalence_continuum#Python|Python]] or [[Meantone]] (91c) mapping, while the sharp version would be a respectable mapping for [[Quasiultra]] (as 91bd). | ||
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=89|xstep=15|ystep=-7}} | |||
{{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=22|xstep=17|ystep=-14}} | {{Lumatone EDO mapping|n=91|start=22|xstep=17|ystep=-14}} | ||
== Quartkeenlig-related rank-3 mappings == | == Quartkeenlig-related rank-3 mappings == |