Orwell extensions: Difference between revisions
m Style |
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Orwell]] has multiple competing [[extension]]s to the [[13-limit]]. This is evidenced by the fact that its [[support]]ing [[equal temperament]]s, [[22edo|22]] and [[31edo|31]], do less well in the 13-limit. The extensions are: | [[Orwell]] has multiple competing [[extension]]s to the [[13-limit]]. This is evidenced by the fact that its [[support]]ing [[equal temperament]]s, [[22edo|22]] and [[31edo|31]], do less well in the 13-limit. The extensions are: | ||
* '''Tridecimal orwell''' (22 & 31) – tempering out 99/98, 121/120, 176/175, and 275/273 | * '''Tridecimal orwell''' {{nowrap|(22 & 31)}} – tempering out 99/98, 121/120, 176/175, and 275/273 | ||
* '''Blair''' (22 & 31f) – tempering out 65/64, 78/77, 91/90, and 99/98 | * '''Blair''' {{nowrap|(22 & 31f)}} – tempering out 65/64, 78/77, 91/90, and 99/98 | ||
* '''Winston''' (22f & 31) – tempering out 66/65, 99/98, 105/104, and 121/120 | * '''Winston''' {{nowrap|(22f & 31)}} – tempering out 66/65, 99/98, 105/104, and 121/120 | ||
The most important of these is tridecimal orwell, which tempers out [[352/351]] and may also be characterized by tempering out [[275/273]] instead. Supported by [[53edo|53]], it has the highest accuracy in its approximation of 13/8, but also the highest complexity. The other two extensions have lower complexity, but also lower accuracy. In winston, | The most important of these is tridecimal orwell, which tempers out [[352/351]] and may also be characterized by tempering out [[275/273]] instead. Supported by [[53edo|53]], it has the highest accuracy in its approximation of 13/8, but also the highest complexity. The other two extensions have lower complexity, but also lower accuracy. In winston, ~13/8 is conflated with ~18/11 and is generally tuned worse than in 31edo as a result of an improved ~18/11. In blair, ~13/8 is conflated with ~8/5 and is generally tuned worse than in 22edo as a result of an improved ~8/5. | ||
Another possible path which relates a sense of compromise is to temper out [[169/168]], leading to [[doublethink]]. This has the effect of slicing the generator in two, and is supported by [[44edo|44]], 53, and [[62edo|62]]. | Another possible path which relates a sense of compromise is to temper out [[169/168]], leading to [[doublethink]]. This has the effect of slicing the generator in two, and is supported by [[44edo|44]], 53, and [[62edo|62]]. | ||