Talk:IFDO: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 431: | Line 431: | ||
--[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC) | --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
I have not been following your discussion with Flora, but from what I've gathered, you believe that your system using the terms EFDO and ELDO is more intuitive for musicians due to using the terms frequency and length, whereas Flora's system using ADO and IDO is more generalizable. However, there is an easy way to have both of these advantages–use a spectrum of resources rather than means, where the "n-resource" is expressed in terms of frequency as f<sup>n</sup>. The terms EFDO, ELDO, and EDO can be maintained for p = 1, p = -1, and p → 0 respectively. For any other p, the term "EpDO" can be used, so my root mean-squared based division can be called an E2DO. | |||
[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC) | |||