1920edo: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 01:21, 4 July 2022 view source Fredg999 category edits (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bots, emailconfirmed 4,330 edits m Categories ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:13, 4 October 2022 view source Plumtree (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 1,976 edits m Infobox ET added Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Infobox ET}}
	The '''1920 division''' divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean_temperament_measures#TE simple badness\|relative error]], only [[1578edo\|1578]] and [[1889edo\|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[Interval_size_measure\|interval size measure]].		The '''1920 division''' divides the octave into 1920 equal parts of exactly 0.625 cents each. It is distinctly consistent through the 25 limit, and in terms of 23-limit [[Tenney-Euclidean_temperament_measures#TE simple badness\|relative error]], only [[1578edo\|1578]] and [[1889edo\|1889]] are both smaller and with a lower relative error. In the 29-limit, only 1578 beats it, and in the 31, 37, 41, 43 and 47 limits, nothing beats it. Because of this and because it is a highly composite number divisible by 12, it is another candidate for [[Interval_size_measure\|interval size measure]].