Quintile family: Difference between revisions

Hemipental: +an alternative 13-limit extension since I'm not convinced by the original one. Also normalize generators
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 27: Line 27:
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 700.548
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 700.548


{{Val list|legend=1| 5, 60, 65, 125d, 185cdd }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 60, 65, 125d, 185cdd }}


[[Badness]]: 0.120942
[[Badness]]: 0.120942
Line 40: Line 40:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.377
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.377


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 5, 60, 65 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 60, 65 }}


Badness: 0.093248
Badness: 0.093248
Line 53: Line 53:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 700.996
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 700.996


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 5, 60, 65, 125de, 190ddef }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 5, 60, 65, 125de, 190ddef }}


Badness: 0.067549
Badness: 0.067549
Line 70: Line 70:
[[POTE generator]]: ~140/81 = 950.6536 (~1029/1024 = 9.3464)
[[POTE generator]]: ~140/81 = 950.6536 (~1029/1024 = 9.3464)


{{Val list|legend=1| 125, 130, 255, 385 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 125, 130, 255, 385 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.104163
[[Badness]]: 0.104163
Line 83: Line 83:
POTE generator: ~140/81 = 950.6341 (~176/175 = 9.3659)
POTE generator: ~140/81 = 950.6341 (~176/175 = 9.3659)


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 125, 130, 255, 385, 640 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 125, 130, 255, 385, 640 }}


Badness: 0.047624
Badness: 0.047624
Line 96: Line 96:
POTE generator: ~140/81 = 950.6677 (~144/143 = 9.3323)
POTE generator: ~140/81 = 950.6677 (~144/143 = 9.3323)


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 125, 130, 255, 385, 515 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 125, 130, 255, 385, 515 }}


Badness: 0.041043
Badness: 0.041043
Line 109: Line 109:
POTE generator: ~26/15 = 950.6593 (~176/175 = 9.3407)
POTE generator: ~26/15 = 950.6593 (~176/175 = 9.3407)


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 125f, 130, 255f, 385f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 125f, 130, 255f, 385f }}


Badness: 0.033542
Badness: 0.033542
Line 126: Line 126:
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.303
[[POTE generator]]: ~3/2 = 701.303


{{Val list|legend=1| 60, 130, 320, 450, 770d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 60, 130, 320, 450, 770d }}


[[Badness]]: 0.104859
[[Badness]]: 0.104859
Line 139: Line 139:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.240
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.240


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 60e, 130, 190, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 60e, 130, 190, 320 }}


Badness: 0.040633
Badness: 0.040633
Line 152: Line 152:
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.252
POTE generator: ~3/2 = 701.252


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 60e, 130, 190, 320 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 60e, 130, 190, 320 }}


Badness: 0.023948
Badness: 0.023948