Talk:159edo: Difference between revisions

Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Reverting factually wrong additions: understanding consistency...
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Line 59: Line 59:
:::: The error "rate" of a specific prime is the same as its relative error, I suppose. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
:::: The error "rate" of a specific prime is the same as its relative error, I suppose. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 17:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


: I, too, am somewhat unsure about this issue. Is it correct that [[consistent|inconsistency/consistency]] is only defined in relation to a specific odd limit? Otherwise it would not be in the Boolean domain. I wished we had another measure for consistency, something that does not depend on an odd limit, but tells how many nodes of a (p-1)-limit lattice could be (somehow) reached from the unison. (But unfortunately my mathematical skills are not sufficient to comprehend this "somehow".) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
: I, too, am somewhat unsure about this issue. Is it correct that [[consistent|inconsistency/consistency]] is only defined in relation to a specific odd limit? Otherwise it would not be in the Boolean domain. I wished we had another measure for consistency, something that does not depend on an odd limit, but tells how many nodes of a (p-1)-dimensional lattice could be (somehow) reached from the unison. (But unfortunately my mathematical skills are not sufficient to comprehend this "somehow".) --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Return to "159edo" page.