Talk:936/935: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:26, 28 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:39, 28 December 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:: After further investigation, it seems that by tempering out 936/935, we end up equating [[289/288]] with [[221/220]], [[256/255]] with [[352/351]], [[375/374]] with [[625/624]], [[351/350]] with [[561/560]], and- in another interesting twist- [[385/384]] (the keenanisma) with [[273/272]] (the tannisma). --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)		:: After further investigation, it seems that by tempering out 936/935, we end up equating [[289/288]] with [[221/220]], [[256/255]] with [[352/351]], [[375/374]] with [[625/624]], [[351/350]] with [[561/560]], and- in another interesting twist- [[385/384]] (the keenanisma) with [[273/272]] (the tannisma). --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 21:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

			:: As for the idea of generating content from nothing, well, that sounds almost like a part of my job description as a pioneer in microtonal music theory- to explore intervals and temperaments where few have explored before, and to find the beauty in intervals that other music theorists have overlooked, ignored, or dismissed. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)