Talk:5/4: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→"classic" misleading: re and please do not consider the P.S. as too serious |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:::::: Sorry about the numerous edits, took me a while to figure out how to say what I wanted to say, especially since some ideas for examples didn't really cut it... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | :::::: Sorry about the numerous edits, took me a while to figure out how to say what I wanted to say, especially since some ideas for examples didn't really cut it... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::::: I think "diatonic" is great as opposite to "chromatic", but isn't this limited to distinguish unison and semitone as the origin of a given step-sized interval? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 15:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC) | |||
::::::: <small>PS: Please don't apologize about your editing style, better invest in changing it. I, for example, often elaborate comments first in a different place and transfer them only when (if at all) I'm satisfied (especially if I'm expecting editing conflicts with co-commenters 😉).</small> | |||