Xenharmonic Wiki:Elections: Difference between revisions
→Comments: reply |
|||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
: Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat. | : Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat. | ||
: As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats. I think that Ganaram Inukshuk | : As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats. | ||
: I think that any of: | |||
* Ganaram Inukshuk | |||
* Bcmills | |||
* Sintel | |||
* Nick Vuci | |||
* Gordon Wery | |||
* Xenoindex | |||
would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first). | |||
: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate? | : Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate? | ||
: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC) | : --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC) | ||