Xenharmonic Wiki:Elections: Difference between revisions

BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Comments: reply
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
Line 48: Line 48:
: Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat.
: Here is the list of current admins: [[Xenharmonic Wiki:Administrators#Current administrators]]. On that list, aside from Fred, I don't see anyone who is both active enough and non-controversial enough to be an ideal candidate for bureaucrat.


: As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats. I think that Ganaram Inukshuk, Sintel and/or Xenoindex would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).
: As such, I think it might make some sense to nominate more new admins; and maybe a year or two down the line if things are going well, they might be nominated as full bureaucrats.
 
: I think that any of:
* Ganaram Inukshuk
* Bcmills
* Sintel  
* Nick Vuci
* Gordon Wery
* Xenoindex
would be good choices (only if they themselves were okay with being nominated though of course; we'd need to ask them individually first).


: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?
: Are there any of those suggestions you agree or disagree with? Any other names you think it might be a good idea to nominate?


: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 01:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)