Talk:5120/5103: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:17, 2 June 2025 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 23,830 edits Re ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:38, 2 June 2025 view source VIxen (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 155 edits →"Universal" name for 5120/5103 Newer edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:: I'm all for ''argent comma''. The similarity with ''argyria'' isn't high enough to worry me. I'm against ''pele comma'' cuz that would set pele as canon which I don't think we should ever do. For the same reason I'd hesitate to call it ''counterpyth comma''. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)		:: I'm all for ''argent comma''. The similarity with ''argyria'' isn't high enough to worry me. I'm against ''pele comma'' cuz that would set pele as canon which I don't think we should ever do. For the same reason I'd hesitate to call it ''counterpyth comma''. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:17, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

			::: OK, then I settle on ''argent comma'' too. That matches my view of argent fifths as a distinct region that's roughly [65\111, 17\29] and sharp of the olympic / garischismic / symbiotic / wilschismic fifths region that's roughly [55\94, 65\111]. --[[User:VIxen\|VIxen]] ([[User talk:VIxen\|talk]]) 18:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)