Talk:IFDO: Difference between revisions

Line 432:

--[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

I have not been following your discussion with Flora, but from what I've gathered, you believe that your system using the terms EFDO and ELDO is more intuitive for musicians due to using the terms frequency and length, whereas Flora's system using ADO and IDO is more generalizable. However, there is an easy way to have both of these advantages–use a spectrum of resources rather than means, where the "n-resource" is expressed in terms of frequency as f<sup>n</sup>. The terms EFDO, ELDO, and E(P)DO can be maintained for n = 1, n = -1, and n → 0 respectively. For any other p, the term "EnDO" (equal n-resource division of the octave) can be used, so the tuning I described on Discord can be called an E2DO, and the tuning halfway between EDO and EFDO can be called an E0.5DO.

I have not been following your discussion with Flora, but from what I've gathered, you believe that your system using the terms EFDO and ELDO is more intuitive for musicians due to using the terms frequency and length, whereas my/Flora's system using ADO and IDO is more generalizable. However, there is an easy way to have both of these advantages–use a spectrum of resources rather than means, where the "n-resource" is expressed in terms of frequency as f<sup>n</sup>. The terms EFDO, ELDO, and E(P)DO can be maintained for n = 1, n = -1, and n → 0 respectively. For any other p, the term "EnDO" (equal n-resource division of the octave) can be used, so the tuning I described on Discord can be called an E2DO, and the tuning halfway between EDO and EFDO can be called an E0.5DO.

[[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 432: / Line 432: @@
 --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 18:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
-I have not been following your discussion with Flora, but from what I've gathered, you believe that your system using the terms EFDO and ELDO is more intuitive for musicians due to using the terms frequency and length, whereas Flora's system using ADO and IDO is more generalizable. However, there is an easy way to have both of these advantages–use a spectrum of resources rather than means, where the "n-resource" is expressed in terms of frequency as f<sup>n</sup>. The terms EFDO, ELDO, and E(P)DO can be maintained for n = 1, n = -1, and n &rarr; 0 respectively. For any other p, the term "EnDO" (equal n-resource division of the octave) can be used, so the tuning I described on Discord can be called an E2DO, and the tuning halfway between EDO and EFDO can be called an E0.5DO.
+I have not been following your discussion with Flora, but from what I've gathered, you believe that your system using the terms EFDO and ELDO is more intuitive for musicians due to using the terms frequency and length, whereas my/Flora's system using ADO and IDO is more generalizable. However, there is an easy way to have both of these advantages–use a spectrum of resources rather than means, where the "n-resource" is expressed in terms of frequency as f<sup>n</sup>. The terms EFDO, ELDO, and E(P)DO can be maintained for n = 1, n = -1, and n &rarr; 0 respectively. For any other p, the term "EnDO" (equal n-resource division of the octave) can be used, so the tuning I described on Discord can be called an E2DO, and the tuning halfway between EDO and EFDO can be called an E0.5DO.
 [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)