Talk:Sagittal notation: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 54:

: Setting aside that wiki talk pages are usually reserved for discussion about the wiki (description of existing work), not the topic itself (I suppose the best place would be the Sagittal forum), I believe that simply using a natural accidental followed by a restatement of whichever accidental needs to be carried over should suffice. That logic could be applied to any combination of two accidental symbol sets, although I know the rules for Kite's ups and downs are slightly different, e.g. an arrow alone implies a natural accidental, cancelling any prior sharp or flat. Furthermore, I think the Sagittal notation system is largely flexible enough to accommodate rank-3 tunings without any other symbols, especially the revo set. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 14:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

::Thanks, Fredg999, that's well answered. Yes, Lucius, please post suggestions like this to https://forum.sagittal.org in future, when they are not about this wiki article. There are in fact two purely-Sagittal naturals that you could use for this purpose, although they were not intended for it. They are the bare shafts up and down, {{Sagittal||}} and {{Sagittal|!}}. See https://w3c-cg.github.io/smufl/latest/tables/herculean-sagittal-extension-very-high-precision-accidental-diacritics.html. [[User:Dave Keenan|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan|talk]]) 01:36, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

::: Thanks — I guess I will have to bite the bullet and create yet another account on yet another site. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 03:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 : Setting aside that wiki talk pages are usually reserved for discussion about the wiki (description of existing work), not the topic itself (I suppose the best place would be the Sagittal forum), I believe that simply using a natural accidental followed by a restatement of whichever accidental needs to be carried over should suffice. That logic could be applied to any combination of two accidental symbol sets, although I know the rules for Kite's ups and downs are slightly different, e.g. an arrow alone implies a natural accidental, cancelling any prior sharp or flat. Furthermore, I think the Sagittal notation system is largely flexible enough to accommodate rank-3 tunings without any other symbols, especially the revo set. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 14:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
+::Thanks, Fredg999, that's well answered. Yes, Lucius, please post suggestions like this to https://forum.sagittal.org in future, when they are not about this wiki article. There are in fact two purely-Sagittal naturals that you could use for this purpose, although they were not intended for it. They are the bare shafts up and down, {{Sagittal||}} and {{Sagittal|!}}. See https://w3c-cg.github.io/smufl/latest/tables/herculean-sagittal-extension-very-high-precision-accidental-diacritics.html. [[User:Dave Keenan|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan|talk]]) 01:36, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
+::: Thanks &mdash; I guess I will have to bite the bullet and create yet another account on yet another site.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 03:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)