Talk:Marvel temperaments: Difference between revisions

Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 49: Line 49:
::::::::: I suppose all I'd really ask for is a note on at least one page somewhere explaining how for dimipent and sensipent, the "-pent" part was originally meant to indicate the 5-limit, but has since lost that meaning, without disappearing as it did in the case of negripent → negri.  
::::::::: I suppose all I'd really ask for is a note on at least one page somewhere explaining how for dimipent and sensipent, the "-pent" part was originally meant to indicate the 5-limit, but has since lost that meaning, without disappearing as it did in the case of negripent → negri.  
::::::::: --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 17:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
::::::::: --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 17:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
::::::::: I just noticed something else while looking at the [[Temperament names]] page. It appears that the "sept-" prefix was used as a suffix in a temperament name ''but in a different way'' than this pattern which was meant to indicate the prime limit. In the name "semisept" it's probably meant to convey the septimal nature of a major sixth (which is semi'd, so I suppose this is a variation on the outdated temperament name "semisixths", which is probably somehow related to sensi; this temperament does not appear, however, to be the same thing as sensisept / 7-limit sensi, as we can see here: https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_74762#74779). So that's just another complication to consider in our documentation of this naming pattern. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 21:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
::::::::: One more thing. I found this page (https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_97783.html#98172) where Graham writes:
<nowiki>The "sept"/"pent" distinction was according to a rule I never agreed
with. I think it was that the TOP tunings had to be the same for the
name to be the same. Gene ignores it. I don't care much either way
for established names, but I may have to keep "Sensisept" because it
exists in a higher limit. I can see the rule makes some sense if
we're talking about temperaments, as I understand them. The existence
of the rule may indicate Paul was understanding temperaments a similar
way. But as I understand temperament classes (which is similar to how
others understand regular temperaments) the tuning is allowed to vary
over a wide range. There are subjective rules I follow when I share
names over different limits and we can talk about individual cases if
you like. I don't have a fixed definition, or deterministic
algorithm, for deciding if two things in different limits are the
same, and I don't want one.</nowiki>
::::::::: So that gives some additional insight to the use of these prefixes, though I haven't yet found the original proposal of this distinction that Graham is referring to. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 21:51, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
:::::::::: ''Semisept'' should be analysed as ''semi-'' prefixed on ''sept'' so the ''sept'' isn't a "suffix" as in ''sensisept'' tho it appears identical. I added a short description to the temperament. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
::::::::::: Okay, thanks for explaining that, Flora.
::::::::::: I did some more research and added notes about the -pent and -sept suffixes to the [[Temperament names]] page under Diminished and dimipent, and linked to there from the sensi section as well as the new section you added to the Negri page. This leaves me satisfied. Feel free to discuss or revise further if I've missed anything. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
== Add another temperament ==
May I add a 17-limit extension of [[python]], that can be described by the EDO join 12f&103? --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 02:28, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
: Sure tho idk if that's the right mapping for the 11-limit and 13-limit. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:19, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
== Links to other marvel temperaments ==
I was the one who added these details in the first place so I know what I'm doing by undoing them. All these details don't inform much yet they take an enormous amount of space, making these links difficult to use. If you want to know about one of these temps, click the link and you'll likely find a description on what it does. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:19, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
== Decic ==
Uses the same mapping for 13 in all its extensions, so the 11-limit extension may be decanonicalized in favor of the 2.3.5.7.13 subgroup interpretation. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:58, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Return to "Marvel temperaments" page.