Unicorn family: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Text replacement - "Badness (Dirichlet): " to "Badness (Sintel): "
m Recategorize
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Technical data page}}
{{Technical data page}}
The '''unicorn family''' tempers out the [[unicorn comma]], 1594323/1562500 = {{monzo| -2 13 -8 }}. The canonical extension to the 7-limit is by interpreting the generator as a slightly flattened [[~]][[28/27]] so that a flat [[~]][[6/5]] is found at 5 generators, corresponding to tempering [[126/125]], the [[octaphore]] and the [[hemimage comma]].
The '''unicorn family''' tempers out the [[unicorn comma]] ({{monzo|legend=1| -2 13 -8 }}, [[ratio]]: 1594323/1562500).  


== Unicorn ==
== Unicorn ==
By noticing that the generator is very close to [[28/27]] we find the extension to the 7-limit by tempering the [[octaphore]] (which finds [[~]][[9/7]] at 7 gens and [[~]][[4/3]] at 8 gens, hence its name) and [[126/125]] (finding [[~]][[6/5]] at 5 gens). From this we can observe that the most natural extension is by equating adjacent [[superparticular interval]]s, by tempering the [[square-particular]]s between them, leading to its [[S-expression]]-based comma list of {[[676/675|S26]], [[729/728|S27]], [[784/783|S28]], [[841/840|S29]]}, to which experimentation shows we can find a reasonable mapping for prime 43 at -11 gens while all other primes require either quite complex mappings (being significantly positive rather than negative) or require high error or both.
Unicorn divides the [[4/3|perfect fourth]] into eight equal parts, three for [[10/9]] and five for [[6/5]]. Its [[ploidacot]] is omega-octacot.  


[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5
Line 10: Line 10:


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 | 0 -8 -13 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 | 0 -8 -13 }}
: mapping generators: ~2, ~250/243


[[Optimal tuning]]s:
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
* [[CTE]]: 2 = 1\1, ~250/243 =  62.441
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 1200.0889{{c}}, ~250/243 =  62.4623{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: 2 = 1\1, ~250/243 = 62.458
: [[error map]]: {{val| +0.089 -1.476 +1.943 }}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~250/243 = 62.4494{{c}}
: error map: {{val| 0.000 -1.550 +1.844 }}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 58, 77, 96, 173, 269 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 58, 77, 96, 173, 269 }}


[[Badness]]:
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 3.53
* Smith: 0.150487
* Dirichlet: 3.530


== Septimal unicorn ==
== Septimal unicorn ==
{{See also| Octaphore }}
The canonical extension to the 7-limit is by interpreting the generator as a very slightly flattened [[~]][[28/27]], corresponding to tempering out 126/125, the [[starling comma]], and 10976/10935, the [[hemimage comma]]. As it equates the perfect fourth with a stack of eight 28/27's, it also tempers out the [[octaphore comma]] in the [[2.3.7 subgroup]].


The hemifourth, reached by four generator steps, can be interpreted as ~[[15/13]]. This gives rise to a natural [[2.3.5.7.13 subgroup|2.3.5.7.13-subgroup]] extension where [[196/195]] and [[676/675]] vanish.
From 10976/10935 = ([[784/783]])<sup>2</sup>⋅([[841/840]]) we obtain an add-29 extension for free, so the generator triples as 28/27~[[29/28]]~[[30/29]], and as 196/195 vanishes already, so does [[729/728]], leading to its [[S-expression]]-based comma list of {[[676/675|S26]], [[729/728|S27]], [[784/783|S28]], [[841/840|S29]]}.
Experimentation shows we can find a reasonable mapping for prime 43 at -11 generator steps, tempering out [[216/215]]. All other primes require either quite complex mappings (being significantly positive rather than negative) or require high error or both.
In all the subgroups above, the optimum is between [[58edo]] and [[77edo]], though a notable tuning not appearing in the [[optimal ET sequence]]s here is [[96edo]] using the 96d val (with a 963{{c}} [[~]][[7/4]] similar to that of [[meanpop]]), which sacrifices the accuracy of prime 7 in favour of a more accurate 5.
=== 7-limit ===
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7


[[Comma list]]: [[126/125]], [[10976/10935]]
[[Comma list]]: 126/125, 10976/10935


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 4 | 0 -8 -13 -23 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 4 | 0 -8 -13 -23 }}


{{Multival|legend=1| 8 13 23 2 14 17 }}
[[Optimal tuning]]s:  
 
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 1199.6949{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2621{{c}}
[[Optimal tuning]]s:
: [[error map]]: {{val| -0.305 -0.662 +3.364 -2.074 }}
* [[CTE]]: 2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.324
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2996{{c}}
* [[POTE]]: 2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.278
: error map: {{val| 0.000 -0.352 +3.792 -1.717 }}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 39d, 58, 77, 135c, 212c }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 39d, 58, 77, 135c, 212c }}


Badness:
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 1.04
* Smith: 0.040913
* Dirichlet: 1.035


=== 2.3.5.7.13 subgroup ===
==== 2.3.5.7.13 subgroup ====
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7.13
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.13


[[Comma list]]: [[126/125]], [[351/350]], [[676/675]]
Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 676/675


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 4 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -25 }}
Subgroup-val mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -25 }}


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): 2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.339
Optimal tunings:  
* WE: ~2 = 1199.7013{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2785{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.3151{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 39df, 58, 77, 212cf }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 39df, 58, 77, 212cf }}


Badness (Sintel): 0.590
Badness (Sintel): 0.590


==== 2.3.5.7.13.29 subgroup ====
==== 2.3.5.7.13.29 subgroup ====
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7.13.29
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.13.29


[[Comma list]]: [[126/125]], [[729/728]], [[784/783]], [[841/840]]
Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 261/260, 377/375


{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -25 -22 }}
Subgroup-val mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 5 6 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -25 -22 }}


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): 2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.334
Optimal tunings:  
* WE: ~2 = 1199.7715{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2860{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.3141{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 39dfj, 58, 77, 212cfn }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 39dfj, 58, 77, 212cf }}


Badness (Sintel): 0.487
Badness (Sintel): 0.487
==== 2.3.5.7.13.29.43 subgroup ====
A notable tuning of unicorn not appearing in the [[optimal ET sequence]] here is [[96edo]] using the 96d val (with a 963[[cent|¢]] [[~]][[7/4]] similar to that of [[meanpop]]), an alternative to [[77edo]] that sacrifices the accuracy of prime 7 in favour of a more accurate [[5/4]] and [[43/32]].
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7.13.29.43
[[Comma list]]: [[126/125]], [[729/728]], [[784/783]], [[841/840]], 216/215
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -25 -22 -11 }}
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): 2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.339
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 39dfj, 58, 77, 135c, 212cfn }}
Badness (Sintel): 0.514


=== Alicorn ===
=== Alicorn ===
Line 90: Line 87:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 3 | 0 -8 -13 -23 9 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 3 | 0 -8 -13 -23 9 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.101
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1198.6510{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.0316{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.1435{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 39d, 58 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 39d, 58 }}


Badness: 0.039156
Badness (Sintel): 1.29


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 103: Line 102:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 3 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 9 -25 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 3 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 9 -25 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.119
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1198.6298{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.0480{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.1636{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 39df, 58 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 39df, 58 }}


Badness: 0.023667
Badness (Sintel): 0.978


=== Camahueto ===
=== Camahueto ===
Line 116: Line 117:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 2 | 0 -8 -13 -23 28 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 2 | 0 -8 -13 -23 28 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.431
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1200.5186{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.4576{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.4252{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 58e, 77, 96d, 173d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 58e, 77, 96d, 173d }}


Badness: 0.065940
Badness (Sintel): 2.18


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 129: Line 132:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 2 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 28 -25 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 2 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 28 -25 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.434
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1200.5004{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.4603{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.4277{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 19, 58e, 77, 96d, 173d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19, 77, 96d, 173d }}


Badness: 0.036155
Badness (Sintel): 1.49


=== Qilin ===
=== Qilin ===
Line 142: Line 147:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 6 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -49 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 6 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -49 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.196
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1199.3865{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.1645{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2199{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 58, 77, 135c, 193c, 328cc }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19e, …, 58, 135c, 193c }}


Badness: 0.041426
Badness (Sintel): 1.37


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Line 155: Line 162:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 6 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -49 -25 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 4 6 5 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -49 -25 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.197
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1199.2874{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.1601{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2251{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 58, 77, 135c, 193cf, 328ccff }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 19e, …, 58, 135c, 193cf }}


Badness: 0.022842
Badness (Sintel): 0.944


=== Monocerus ===
=== Monocerus ===
Line 168: Line 177:
Mapping: {{mapping| 2 4 6 8 9 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -20 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 2 4 6 8 9 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -20 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.292
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~99/70 = 599.8223{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2737{{c}}
* CWE: ~99/70 = 600.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.3180{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 58, 96d, 154, 212ce, 366cce }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 38d, 58, 96d, 154, 212ce }}


Badness: 0.052757
Badness (Sintel): 1.74


==== 13-limit ====
==== 13-limit ====
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13


Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 364/363, 676/675
Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 243/242, 364/363


Mapping: {{mapping| 2 4 6 8 9 10 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -20 -25 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 2 4 6 8 9 10 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -20 -25 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~28/27 = 62.301
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~55/39 = 599.8267{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.2833{{c}}
* CWE: ~55/39 = 600.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.3262{{c}}
 
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 38df, 58, 96d, 154 }}
 
Badness (Sintel): 1.19
 
==== 17-limit ====
Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 58, 96d, 154, 366ccef }}
Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 221/220, 243/242, 289/288


Badness: 0.028795
Mapping: {{mapping| 2 4 6 8 9 10 9 | 0 -8 -13 -23 -20 -25 -8 }}
 
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~17/12 = 600.0715{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.3767{{c}}
* CWE: ~17/12 = 600.0000{{c}}, ~28/27 = 62.3605{{c}}
 
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 38df, 58, 96d, 154 }}
 
Badness (Sintel): 1.24


== Rhinoceros ==
== Rhinoceros ==
Rhinoceros tempers out the [[semaphoresma]] and the [[ragisma]], identifying the generator as a [[~]][[21/20]], rather than the [[28/27]] of septimal unicorn. It may be described as the {{nowrap| 19 & 20c }} temperament. [[19edo]] is a good tuning, though [[39edo]] is a possible alternative.
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7
[[Subgroup]]: 2.3.5.7


Line 194: Line 224:
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 3 | 0 -8 -13 -4 }}
{{Mapping|legend=1| 1 2 3 3 | 0 -8 -13 -4 }}


{{Multival|legend=1| 8 13 4 2 -16 -27 }}
[[Optimal tuning]]s:
* [[WE]]: ~2 = 1203.1031{{c}}, ~21/20 = 63.0830{{c}}
: [[error map]]: {{val| +3.103 -0.412 +2.917 -11.848 }}
* [[CWE]]: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~21/20 = 62.6687{{c}}
: error map: {{val| 0.000 -3.305 -1.007 -19.501 }}


[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 62.920
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 1c, …, 18bcd, 19 }}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 1c, 19 }}
[[Badness]] (Sintel): 2.07
 
[[Badness]]: 0.081864


=== 11-limit ===
=== 11-limit ===
Line 209: Line 241:
Mapping: {{mapping|  1 2 3 3 4 | 0 -8 -13 -4 -10 }}
Mapping: {{mapping|  1 2 3 3 4 | 0 -8 -13 -4 -10 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 62.874
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1201.1458{{c}}, ~21/20 = 62.9338{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~21/20 = 62.7783{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 1ce, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 1ce, 18bcd, 19 }}


Badness: 0.059319
Badness (Sintel): 1.96


=== 13-limit ===
=== 13-limit ===
Line 222: Line 256:
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 3 4 4 | 0 -8 -13 -4 -10 -6 }}
Mapping: {{mapping| 1 2 3 3 4 4 | 0 -8 -13 -4 -10 -6 }}


Optimal tuning (POTE): ~2 = 1\1, ~21/20 = 63.043
Optimal tunings:
* WE: ~2 = 1202.2047{{c}}, ~21/20 = 63.1591{{c}}
* CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000{{c}}, ~21/20 = 62.8727{{c}}


{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 1ce, 19 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=0| 1ce, 18bcdf, 19 }}


Badness: 0.039343
Badness (Sintel): 1.63


[[Category:Unicorn family| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Temperament families]]
[[Category:Temperament families]]
[[Category:Unicorn family| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Catalogs of rank-2 temperaments]]
[[Category:Unicorn| ]] <!-- key article -->
[[Category:Rank 2]]

Latest revision as of 12:25, 14 August 2026

This is a list showing technical temperament data. For an explanation of what information is shown here, you may look at the technical data guide for regular temperaments.

The unicorn family tempers out the unicorn comma (monzo[-2 13 -8, ratio: 1594323/1562500).

Unicorn

Unicorn divides the perfect fourth into eight equal parts, three for 10/9 and five for 6/5. Its ploidacot is omega-octacot.

Subgroup: 2.3.5

Comma list: 1594323/1562500

Mapping[1 2 3], 0 -8 -13]]

mapping generators: ~2, ~250/243

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.0889 ¢, ~250/243 = 62.4623 ¢
error map: +0.089 -1.476 +1.943]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~250/243 = 62.4494 ¢
error map: 0.000 -1.550 +1.844]

Optimal ET sequence19, 58, 77, 96, 173, 269

Badness (Sintel): 3.53

Septimal unicorn

The canonical extension to the 7-limit is by interpreting the generator as a very slightly flattened ~28/27, corresponding to tempering out 126/125, the starling comma, and 10976/10935, the hemimage comma. As it equates the perfect fourth with a stack of eight 28/27's, it also tempers out the octaphore comma in the 2.3.7 subgroup.

The hemifourth, reached by four generator steps, can be interpreted as ~15/13. This gives rise to a natural 2.3.5.7.13-subgroup extension where 196/195 and 676/675 vanish.

From 10976/10935 = (784/783)2⋅(841/840) we obtain an add-29 extension for free, so the generator triples as 28/27~29/28~30/29, and as 196/195 vanishes already, so does 729/728, leading to its S-expression-based comma list of {S26, S27, S28, S29}.

Experimentation shows we can find a reasonable mapping for prime 43 at -11 generator steps, tempering out 216/215. All other primes require either quite complex mappings (being significantly positive rather than negative) or require high error or both.

In all the subgroups above, the optimum is between 58edo and 77edo, though a notable tuning not appearing in the optimal ET sequences here is 96edo using the 96d val (with a 963 ¢ ~7/4 similar to that of meanpop), which sacrifices the accuracy of prime 7 in favour of a more accurate 5.

7-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 126/125, 10976/10935

Mapping[1 2 3 4], 0 -8 -13 -23]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.6949 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2621 ¢
error map: -0.305 -0.662 +3.364 -2.074]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2996 ¢
error map: 0.000 -0.352 +3.792 -1.717]

Optimal ET sequence19, 39d, 58, 77, 135c, 212c

Badness (Sintel): 1.04

2.3.5.7.13 subgroup

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.13

Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 676/675

Subgroup-val mapping: [1 2 3 4 5], 0 -8 -13 -23 -25]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.7013 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2785 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.3151 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19, 39df, 58, 77, 212cf

Badness (Sintel): 0.590

2.3.5.7.13.29 subgroup

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.13.29

Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 261/260, 377/375

Subgroup-val mapping: [1 2 3 4 5 6], 0 -8 -13 -23 -25 -22]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.7715 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2860 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.3141 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19, 39dfj, 58, 77, 212cf

Badness (Sintel): 0.487

Alicorn

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 540/539, 896/891

Mapping: [1 2 3 4 3], 0 -8 -13 -23 9]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1198.6510 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.0316 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.1435 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19, 39d, 58

Badness (Sintel): 1.29

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 126/125, 144/143, 196/195, 676/675

Mapping: [1 2 3 4 3 5], 0 -8 -13 -23 9 -25]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1198.6298 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.0480 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.1636 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19, 39df, 58

Badness (Sintel): 0.978

Camahueto

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 385/384, 10976/10935

Mapping: [1 2 3 4 2], 0 -8 -13 -23 28]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.5186 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.4576 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.4252 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19, 58e, 77, 96d, 173d

Badness (Sintel): 2.18

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 385/384, 676/675

Mapping: [1 2 3 4 2 5], 0 -8 -13 -23 28 -25]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1200.5004 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.4603 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.4277 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19, 77, 96d, 173d

Badness (Sintel): 1.49

Qilin

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 176/175, 10976/10935

Mapping: [1 2 3 4 6], 0 -8 -13 -23 -49]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.3865 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.1645 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2199 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19e, …, 58, 135c, 193c

Badness (Sintel): 1.37

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 126/125, 176/175, 196/195, 2200/2197

Mapping: [1 2 3 4 6 5], 0 -8 -13 -23 -49 -25]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1199.2874 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.1601 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2251 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 19e, …, 58, 135c, 193cf

Badness (Sintel): 0.944

Monocerus

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 126/125, 243/242, 5488/5445

Mapping: [2 4 6 8 9], 0 -8 -13 -23 -20]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~99/70 = 599.8223 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2737 ¢
  • CWE: ~99/70 = 600.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.3180 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 38d, 58, 96d, 154, 212ce

Badness (Sintel): 1.74

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 243/242, 364/363

Mapping: [2 4 6 8 9 10], 0 -8 -13 -23 -20 -25]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~55/39 = 599.8267 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.2833 ¢
  • CWE: ~55/39 = 600.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.3262 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 38df, 58, 96d, 154

Badness (Sintel): 1.19

17-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13.17

Comma list: 126/125, 196/195, 221/220, 243/242, 289/288

Mapping: [2 4 6 8 9 10 9], 0 -8 -13 -23 -20 -25 -8]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~17/12 = 600.0715 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.3767 ¢
  • CWE: ~17/12 = 600.0000 ¢, ~28/27 = 62.3605 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 38df, 58, 96d, 154

Badness (Sintel): 1.24

Rhinoceros

Rhinoceros tempers out the semaphoresma and the ragisma, identifying the generator as a ~21/20, rather than the 28/27 of septimal unicorn. It may be described as the 19 & 20c temperament. 19edo is a good tuning, though 39edo is a possible alternative.

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7

Comma list: 49/48, 4375/4374

Mapping[1 2 3 3], 0 -8 -13 -4]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1203.1031 ¢, ~21/20 = 63.0830 ¢
error map: +3.103 -0.412 +2.917 -11.848]
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~21/20 = 62.6687 ¢
error map: 0.000 -3.305 -1.007 -19.501]

Optimal ET sequence1c, …, 18bcd, 19

Badness (Sintel): 2.07

11-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11

Comma list: 49/48, 100/99, 126/121

Mapping: [1 2 3 3 4], 0 -8 -13 -4 -10]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1201.1458 ¢, ~21/20 = 62.9338 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~21/20 = 62.7783 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 1ce, 18bcd, 19

Badness (Sintel): 1.96

13-limit

Subgroup: 2.3.5.7.11.13

Comma list: 49/48, 78/77, 100/99, 126/121

Mapping: [1 2 3 3 4 4], 0 -8 -13 -4 -10 -6]]

Optimal tunings:

  • WE: ~2 = 1202.2047 ¢, ~21/20 = 63.1591 ¢
  • CWE: ~2 = 1200.0000 ¢, ~21/20 = 62.8727 ¢

Optimal ET sequence: 1ce, 18bcdf, 19

Badness (Sintel): 1.63