Ed5/4: Difference between revisions

Contribution (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
m Removing from Category:Edonoi using Cat-a-lot
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


== Properties ==
== Properties ==
Division of 5/4 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an [[equivalence]]. The question of equivalence is still in its infancy. The utility of 5/4 as a base though, is apparent by providing a novel consonance after 3, and being the [[octave reduction|octave-reduced]] basis for [[5-limit]] harmony. Many, if not all, of these scales have a perceptually important pseudo (false) octave, with various degrees of accuracy.
Division of 5/4 into equal parts does not necessarily imply directly using this interval as an [[equivalence]]. Many, though not all, ed5/4 scales have a perceptually important [[Pseudo-octave|false octave]], with various degrees of accuracy.
 
5/4 is particularly narrow as far as equivalences go and it is difficult to fit consonant chords in it, so we might consider using 5/4<sup>2</sup> = [[25/16]] as the equivalence instead.


ED5/4 tuning systems that accurately represent the intervals 10/9 and 9/8 include: [[17ed5/4]] (0.61 cent error), [[19ed5/4]] (0.59 cent error), and [[36ed5/4]] (0.02 cent error).
ED5/4 tuning systems that accurately represent the intervals 10/9 and 9/8 include: [[17ed5/4]] (0.61 cent error), [[19ed5/4]] (0.59 cent error), and [[36ed5/4]] (0.02 cent error).
Line 69: Line 67:
|}
|}


[[Category:Ed5/4| ]] <!-- main article -->
[[Category:Ed5/4's| ]]
[[Category:Edonoi]]
<!-- main article -->
[[Category:Major third]]
[[Category:Major third]]
[[Category:Lists of scales]]
[[Category:Lists of scales]]
{{todo|inline=1|explain edonoi|text=Most people do not think 5/4 sounds like an equivalence, so there must be some other reason why people are dividing it — some property ''other than'' equivalence that makes people want to divide it. Please add to this page an explanation of what that reason is.}}