Talk:General theory: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Move portal to talk page
Sintel (talk | contribs)
m link
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{WSArchiveLink}}
{{Portal}}
{{Portal}}
== Are these things really "core concepts"? ==
- Hexany
- Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic
- Equal division of the tritave
- Chord of nature
-- [[User:VectorGraphics|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics|talk]]) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
: No, not really. EDTs is an interesting case, because if you ask me they should be a sidenote at best. For some reason in music education, if you see anything about microtonality, it is likely to include something like JI, 24edo, and Bohlen-Pierce. Why it is this way, I have no idea.
: Regardless, here's my proposal:
* [[Just intonation]]
** [[Harmonic series]]
** [[Harmonic limit]]
** [[Odd limit]]
* [[Scale|Scales]]
** [[Equal division of the octave]]
** [[MOS scale]]
** [[Periods and generators]]
* [[Temperaments]]
** [[Equal temperament]]
** [[Well temperament]]
** [[Regular temperament]]
: Other things to consider: JI: [[just intonation subgroup]], scales: [[step pattern]], maybe [[combination product set]] instead of hexany. I personally like "Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic" enough but it should be under "RTT" if we keep it.
: – [[User:Sintel|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 09:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:52, 23 April 2025

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.
This article is easily accessed and is intended to serve as a portal to the pedagogical enrichment of newcomers to the xenharmonic community as well as of more established members who are unaware of certain bodies of knowledge. As a result, it has been semi-protected to prevent vandalism.

Please be mindful of this when making edits to the article, or to the articles linked herefrom.

Are these things really "core concepts"?

- Hexany

- Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic

- Equal division of the tritave

- Chord of nature

-- VectorGraphics (talk) 04:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

No, not really. EDTs is an interesting case, because if you ask me they should be a sidenote at best. For some reason in music education, if you see anything about microtonality, it is likely to include something like JI, 24edo, and Bohlen-Pierce. Why it is this way, I have no idea.
Regardless, here's my proposal:
Other things to consider: JI: just intonation subgroup, scales: step pattern, maybe combination product set instead of hexany. I personally like "Diatonic, chromatic, enharmonic, subchromatic" enough but it should be under "RTT" if we keep it.
Sintel🎏 (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)