37th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
ArrowHead294 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox fractional-octave|37}} | |||
[[37edo]] has an extremely precise mapping for the 11th harmonic, and it is a strong 2.5.7.13 tuning besides that, therefore various 37th-octave temperaments occur naturally between any two numbers whose greatest common divisor is 37. | [[37edo]] has an extremely precise mapping for the 11th harmonic, and it is a strong 2.5.7.13 tuning besides that, therefore various 37th-octave temperaments occur naturally between any two numbers whose greatest common divisor is 37. | ||
== 37-11-commatic (rank-1) == | |||
{{Main|37-11-comma}} | |||
Subgroup: 2.11 | |||
Comma list: {{monzo|128 -37}} | |||
{{mapping|legend=2| 37 28 }} | |||
: mapping generators: ~35184372088832/34522712143931 = 1\37 | |||
[[Support]]ing [[ET]]s: 37N, N = 1 to 485 | |||
== Rubidium == | == Rubidium == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 27: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 703.3903 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[POTE]]): ~3/2 = 703.3903 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.312105 | [[Badness]]: 0.312105 | ||
| Line 27: | Line 40: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0355 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0355 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }} | ||
Badness: 0.101001 | Badness: 0.101001 | ||
| Line 40: | Line 53: | ||
Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0520 | Optimal tuning (POTE): ~3/2 = 703.0520 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 74, 111 }} | ||
Badness: 0.048732 | Badness: 0.048732 | ||
| Line 55: | Line 68: | ||
[[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~24000/16807 = 612.4003 | [[Optimal tuning]] ([[CTE]]): ~24000/16807 = 612.4003 | ||
{{ | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 222b, 259b, 296, 629 }} | ||
[[Badness]]: 0.784746 | [[Badness]]: 0.784746 | ||
| Line 68: | Line 81: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~768/359 = 612.4003 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~768/359 = 612.4003 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629 }} | ||
Badness: 0.167327 | Badness: 0.167327 | ||
| Line 81: | Line 94: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~462/325 = 612.4206 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~462/325 = 612.4206 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }} | ||
Badness: 0.076183 | Badness: 0.076183 | ||
| Line 94: | Line 107: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~121/85 = 612.4187 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~121/85 = 612.4187 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 37, 259b, 296, 629f }} | ||
Badness: 0.052475 | Badness: 0.052475 | ||
| Line 135: | Line 148: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~11979/10240 = 271.712 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~11979/10240 = 271.712 | ||
Optimal | {{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|296, 1369, 1665}}, ... | ||
{{Navbox fractional-octave}} | |||