Xenharmonic Wiki talk:License: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 43:

::::: Well, the wiki ''could'' take the position that specific items such as your songs may be listed with a different license. It doesn't strictly have to be all the same. But assuming the smoother everything-the-same, any contributor retains complete copyright to their own work. You can register your songs and use them in any capacity, as you are the copyright holder. You are just licensing the content here under CC-BY-SA which means that at least the ''aspects'' of the songs that are here are then usable by people under the CC-BY-SA license. You can still separately license or use your own songs in any way you choose with anyone, you are not bound by the license yourself. But if others contribute non-trivially to your songs here, you would need to follow CC-BY-SA in your use of their contributions. The same principles apply right now with the current CC license anyway. --[[User:Wolftune|Wolftune]] ([[User talk:Wolftune|talk]]) 19:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

:::::: Nice. Then that means that I'm completely on board with the smoother everything-the-same CC-BY-SA treatment. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 20:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:47, 24 March 2021 view source Wolftune (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 84 edits →Response: about the rights for people who posted material here ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 01:25, 7 March 2023 view source Fredg999 (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Interface administrators, Sysops 6,129 edits m Fredg999 moved page Talk:Xenharmonic Wiki License to Xenharmonic Wiki talk:License: Project page
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 43:		Line 43:

	::::: Well, the wiki ''could'' take the position that specific items such as your songs may be listed with a different license. It doesn't strictly have to be all the same. But assuming the smoother everything-the-same, any contributor retains complete copyright to their own work. You can register your songs and use them in any capacity, as you are the copyright holder. You are just licensing the content here under CC-BY-SA which means that at least the ''aspects'' of the songs that are here are then usable by people under the CC-BY-SA license. You can still separately license or use your own songs in any way you choose with anyone, you are not bound by the license yourself. But if others contribute non-trivially to your songs here, you would need to follow CC-BY-SA in your use of their contributions. The same principles apply right now with the current CC license anyway. --[[User:Wolftune\|Wolftune]] ([[User talk:Wolftune\|talk]]) 19:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)		::::: Well, the wiki ''could'' take the position that specific items such as your songs may be listed with a different license. It doesn't strictly have to be all the same. But assuming the smoother everything-the-same, any contributor retains complete copyright to their own work. You can register your songs and use them in any capacity, as you are the copyright holder. You are just licensing the content here under CC-BY-SA which means that at least the ''aspects'' of the songs that are here are then usable by people under the CC-BY-SA license. You can still separately license or use your own songs in any way you choose with anyone, you are not bound by the license yourself. But if others contribute non-trivially to your songs here, you would need to follow CC-BY-SA in your use of their contributions. The same principles apply right now with the current CC license anyway. --[[User:Wolftune\|Wolftune]] ([[User talk:Wolftune\|talk]]) 19:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

			:::::: Nice. Then that means that I'm completely on board with the smoother everything-the-same CC-BY-SA treatment. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)