Marvel: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

7 June 2025

29 April 2025

19 April 2025

13 February 2025

16 January 2025

15 January 2025

  • curprev 23:1223:12, 15 January 2025 Godtone talk contribs m 8,264 bytes +43 note 125edo as a good larger edo choice, note 72edo as performant, change language to be more neutral
  • curprev 21:3821:38, 15 January 2025 Godtone talk contribs m 8,221 bytes +73 Tunings: this is wrong both from first principle but also wrong if you look at all of TE, CTE, WE, CWE, E/EE, CE/CEE, and it's seemingly inconsistent with your reasoning about minimizing damage on 9-odd-limit
  • curprev 21:2321:23, 15 January 2025 Godtone talk contribs m 8,148 bytes +391 simpler intervals have less tuning fidelity; this isnt a matter of opinion, it's an inevitable mathematical truth. odd 25 is a reasonable target for marvel which 53edo already tempers about as much as can be reasonable; shouldnt more of the lattice be captured? also, 225/224 is larger than the step size of these edos so the inconsistency should be cautioned
  • curprev 10:1010:10, 15 January 2025 FloraC talk contribs 7,757 bytes +26 Tunings: it has occurred to me that overtempering obviously means tuning prime 7 flat (tempering 3 and 5 so much that the targeted 7 goes over the line), so this entire "12edo is the only overtempered small edo tuning" narrative is also wrong
  • curprev 09:5609:56, 15 January 2025 FloraC talk contribs 7,731 bytes +73 Tunings: the logic was backwards as it was the optimal tunings that indicated how to close out the comma, not that the optimal tunings needed to be checked against how to close out the comma. The only exception is CWE which doesn't need to follow, but since it does, we can cover it under derivatives of TE
  • curprev 09:4209:42, 15 January 2025 FloraC talk contribs 7,658 bytes −785 Tunings: rework: this analysis is so at odds with everyone else's, as we've long found 197- and 240edo to be optimal edo tunings in the 7-limit, which is very well documented. The idea of not targeting 7-odd-limit intervals in favor of complex 5-limit intervals is very sus; the facts about 53edo and 84edo are also wrong, with 125edo missing, and the constraint of consistency is so arbitrary that it seems to be there just to single out the edos you like
  • curprev 08:5108:51, 15 January 2025 FloraC talk contribs 8,443 bytes +3,183 Move some tuning information from 225/224 page

21 August 2024

15 April 2024

4 October 2023

26 September 2023

5 September 2023

5 May 2023

28 April 2023

3 February 2023

22 September 2022

1 March 2022

8 February 2022

30 September 2021

18 July 2021

1 June 2021

23 February 2021

22 February 2021

21 February 2021

17 July 2018

4 December 2013

18 August 2011

  • curprev 16:1116:11, 18 August 2011 Wikispaces>keenanpepper 1,342 bytes +1,342 **Imported revision 246784029 - Original comment: **