Talk:353edo: Difference between revisions
re |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: I just fixed the external link (see page history). On that page, you'll see that it mentions a 353-year cycle (with 130 leap years), so it's not really about a 353-day cycle (although some years do happen to have 353 days in that system, it seems). Note that this is only a proposed calendar reform, as far as I know, to clarify the context. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 01:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) | : I just fixed the external link (see page history). On that page, you'll see that it mentions a 353-year cycle (with 130 leap years), so it's not really about a 353-day cycle (although some years do happen to have 353 days in that system, it seems). Note that this is only a proposed calendar reform, as far as I know, to clarify the context. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 01:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
:: Xenwolf, I see you're confusing the number of '''days''' in the common Hebrew year with the number of '''years''' in the cycle that was ''proposed'' to replace the original Hebrew calendar due to seasonal discrepancy. | |||