Talk:Monzo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
re |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:: It still involves counting, which ideally should be avoided. I suggest writing out the subgroup explicitly and omit the zeroes. For example, 19/16 is 2.19 {{monzo| -4 1 }}. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC) | :: It still involves counting, which ideally should be avoided. I suggest writing out the subgroup explicitly and omit the zeroes. For example, 19/16 is 2.19 {{monzo| -4 1 }}. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 13:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: I'd like to avoid monzos whose meaning depends on a subgroup prefix. I'm instead thinking of making a Lua module to find prime factors in a given rational number (counting zeros will be automated here). --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 19:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:11, 29 November 2021
Pronunciation
I don’t seem to find anywhere how is Joe Monzo’s last name, and monzo the term, are pronounced: with the usual z or with z like in pizza, or in other manner?.. It would certainly aid in translating the term to another language. :) --Arseniiv (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- I found Now&Xen Podcast: 038 - Joe Monzo - YouTube - just listening - at some point the correct pronunciation of the name must appear in the video 😉 --Xenwolf (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Coping with large amounts of zeros
There are cases where monzo notation translates simple-to-read ratios into hard-to-read expressions, see for example 19/16. Eliora now introduced a notation that I was thinking about for years: [-4 06 1⟩ instead of [-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1⟩. What do others think about it? --Xenwolf (talk) 21:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- There are also cases like 29/23 where lots of low-order primes have to be skipped at the beginning. In terms of readability, I would prefer [09 -1 1⟩ to [0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 1⟩. --Xenwolf (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)