Talk:Kite's color notation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 00:44, 13 July 2021 view source TallKite (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Sysops 3,990 edits →Incorrect formula for converting a color name? ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:06, 26 July 2021 view source TallKite (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Sysops 3,990 edits →Incorrect formula for converting a color name? Newer edit →
Line 77:		Line 77:

	: Seeing the xen-calc output, Praveen and I decided that large and small should definitely be abbreviated la- and sa- not only in temperament names, but in all interval names. Likewise double and triple should always become bi- and tri-. I updated this page to reflect that. Again, so nice to have an app for this!! :) --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)		: Seeing the xen-calc output, Praveen and I decided that large and small should definitely be abbreviated la- and sa- not only in temperament names, but in all interval names. Likewise double and triple should always become bi- and tri-. I updated this page to reflect that. Again, so nice to have an app for this!! :) --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

			: The more I think about calling descending intervals negative, the more strongly I feel that they shouldn't be. Because I have said in the past things like "prime 23 is best mapped to a 5th, not a 4th, because that mapping minimizes negative intervals." That sentence doesn't make any sense with the broader definition of negative. --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 05:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)